CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt Alterna
MCC 0.549 > 0.393
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.607 ± 0.080 > 0.445 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.489 > 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.626 > 0.435
Total TP 427 > 319
Total TN 76916 > 76865
Total FP 261 < 434
Total FP CONTRA 16 < 40
Total FP INCONS 239 < 374
Total FP COMP 6 < 20
Total FN 446 < 554
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Alterna).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 427
Total TN 76916
Total FP 261
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 239
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 446
Total Scores
MCC 0.549
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.607 ± 0.080
Sensitivity 0.489
Positive Predictive Value 0.626
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.75 0.65 0.87 13 765 2 0 2 0 7
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 623 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.39 0.37 0.44 7 1209 9 0 9 0 12
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.45 0.43 0.47 9 1997 10 0 10 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 22 0 21 1 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 2 931 13 2 11 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01073 0.56 0.47 0.67 16 4347 9 0 8 1 18
PDB_01194 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.49 0.36 0.69 9 1817 4 0 4 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
RFA_00632 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 4069 10 2 8 0 12
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 2 7 0 10
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.47 0.39 0.58 7 2004 5 1 4 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 319
Total TN 76865
Total FP 434
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 374
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 554
Total Scores
MCC 0.393
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.445 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.435
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.11 0.13 0.14 2 616 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 2 6 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.68 0.55 0.86 6 554 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00243 - 0.51 0.50 0.55 6 619 5 0 5 0 6
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00571 0.41 0.40 0.43 10 3298 13 3 10 0 15
PDB_00713 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1997 19 0 19 0 21
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 21 3 18 0 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 2258 3 2 1 0 7
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 4 4721 28 0 28 0 37
PDB_00857 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1068 13 0 13 0 15
PDB_00874 - 0.09 0.10 0.11 2 928 16 2 14 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.86 0.86 0.86 18 2464 6 0 3 3 3
PDB_01020 0.76 0.70 0.84 16 2259 4 2 1 1 7
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.49 0.43 0.60 3 226 2 2 0 0 4
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18
PDB_01194 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 0 8 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1809 21 0 21 0 25
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
RFA_00632 0.24 0.25 0.23 7 4065 23 3 20 0 21
RFA_00636 0.50 0.46 0.54 13 3981 13 3 8 2 15
RFA_00767 0.54 0.50 0.60 9 1876 6 2 4 0 9
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 9 0 6 3 10
RFA_00769 0.38 0.39 0.39 7 1935 11 2 9 0 11
RFA_00770 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 2003 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00773 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 1940 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1999 19 3 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 11 0 9 2 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.