CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt Fold
MCC 0.458 > 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.082 > 0.528 ± 0.080
Sensitivity 0.419 < 0.431
Positive Predictive Value 0.508 > 0.485
Total TP 493 < 508
Total TN 158536 > 158458
Total FP 487 < 557
Total FP CONTRA 58 < 71
Total FP INCONS 419 < 469
Total FP COMP 10 < 17
Total FN 685 > 670
P-value 0.696686202358

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Fold).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 493
Total TN 158536
Total FP 487
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 419
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 685
Total Scores
MCC 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.419
Positive Predictive Value 0.508
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.75 0.65 0.87 13 765 2 0 2 0 7
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 623 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.39 0.37 0.44 7 1209 9 0 9 0 12
PDB_00370 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15188 37 15 22 0 25
PDB_00447 - 0.30 0.25 0.37 11 7110 19 4 15 0 33
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.45 0.43 0.47 9 1997 10 0 10 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 22 0 21 1 23
PDB_00804 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15350 52 6 44 2 50
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 2 931 13 2 11 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.33 0.30 0.36 16 12676 28 2 26 0 38
PDB_01073 0.56 0.47 0.67 16 4347 9 0 8 1 18
PDB_01092 0.74 0.63 0.87 33 10115 7 1 4 2 19
PDB_01194 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.18 0.15 0.22 6 12063 21 5 16 0 35
PDB_01260 - 0.49 0.36 0.69 9 1817 4 0 4 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9118 62 9 53 0 39
RFA_00632 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 4069 10 2 8 0 12
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 2 7 0 10
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.47 0.39 0.58 7 2004 5 1 4 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 508
Total TN 158458
Total FP 557
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 469
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 670
Total Scores
MCC 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.528 ± 0.080
Sensitivity 0.431
Positive Predictive Value 0.485
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.75 0.65 0.87 13 765 2 0 2 0 7
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.59 0.50 0.71 5 489 2 0 2 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.39 0.37 0.44 7 1209 9 0 9 0 12
PDB_00370 - 0.09 0.12 0.07 3 15179 45 12 31 2 22
PDB_00447 - 0.27 0.25 0.30 11 7103 26 6 20 0 33
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00713 - 0.43 0.43 0.45 9 1996 11 0 11 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2678 24 1 22 1 23
PDB_00804 - 0.31 0.32 0.31 16 15348 38 6 30 2 34
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.67 0.60 0.75 9 1069 3 0 3 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.09 0.10 0.11 2 928 16 2 14 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.68 0.63 0.74 34 12674 12 0 12 0 20
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
PDB_01092 0.73 0.63 0.85 33 10114 8 0 6 2 19
PDB_01194 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.82 0.68 1.00 15 1113 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01203 - 0.71 0.63 0.80 12 1161 3 2 1 0 7
PDB_01250 - 0.10 0.10 0.12 4 12056 30 7 23 0 37
PDB_01260 - 0.58 0.48 0.71 12 1813 5 1 4 0 13
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9118 62 9 53 0 39
RFA_00632 0.39 0.39 0.39 11 4067 17 2 15 0 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00767 0.44 0.44 0.44 8 1873 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 10 1 8 1 10
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 3 1 0 2 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 18 2 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.