CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & Murlet(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt Murlet(20)
MCC 0.792 > 0.741
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.807 ± 0.173 > 0.748 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.692 > 0.594
Positive Predictive Value 0.911 < 0.929
Total TP 92 > 79
Total TN 14632 < 14648
Total FP 11 > 8
Total FP CONTRA 1 > 0
Total FP INCONS 8 > 6
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 41 < 54
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Murlet(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Murlet(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Murlet(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 92
Total TN 14632
Total FP 11
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 41
Total Scores
MCC 0.792
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.807 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.692
Positive Predictive Value 0.911
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.56 0.47 0.67 16 4347 9 0 8 1 18

^top



Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 79
Total TN 14648
Total FP 8
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 54
Total Scores
MCC 0.741
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.748 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.594
Positive Predictive Value 0.929
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.59 0.52 0.68 13 3302 7 0 6 1 12
PDB_00828 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_00829 0.82 0.67 1.00 16 2262 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_01020 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 2262 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01073 0.66 0.44 1.00 15 4356 1 0 0 1 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.