CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt UNAFold
MCC 0.458 > 0.412
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.082 > 0.492 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.419 > 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.508 > 0.443
Total TP 493 > 460
Total TN 158536 > 158467
Total FP 487 < 591
Total FP CONTRA 58 < 86
Total FP INCONS 419 < 493
Total FP COMP 10 < 12
Total FN 685 < 718
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 493
Total TN 158536
Total FP 487
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 419
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 685
Total Scores
MCC 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.419
Positive Predictive Value 0.508
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.75 0.65 0.87 13 765 2 0 2 0 7
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 623 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.39 0.37 0.44 7 1209 9 0 9 0 12
PDB_00370 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15188 37 15 22 0 25
PDB_00447 - 0.30 0.25 0.37 11 7110 19 4 15 0 33
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.45 0.43 0.47 9 1997 10 0 10 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 22 0 21 1 23
PDB_00804 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15350 52 6 44 2 50
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 2 931 13 2 11 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.33 0.30 0.36 16 12676 28 2 26 0 38
PDB_01073 0.56 0.47 0.67 16 4347 9 0 8 1 18
PDB_01092 0.74 0.63 0.87 33 10115 7 1 4 2 19
PDB_01194 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.18 0.15 0.22 6 12063 21 5 16 0 35
PDB_01260 - 0.49 0.36 0.69 9 1817 4 0 4 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9118 62 9 53 0 39
RFA_00632 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 4069 10 2 8 0 12
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 2 7 0 10
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.47 0.39 0.58 7 2004 5 1 4 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 460
Total TN 158467
Total FP 591
Total FP CONTRA 86
Total FP INCONS 493
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 718
Total Scores
MCC 0.412
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.443
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.59 0.50 0.71 5 489 2 0 2 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1210 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00370 - 0.09 0.12 0.07 3 15179 45 12 31 2 22
PDB_00447 - 0.44 0.39 0.52 17 7107 16 6 10 0 27
PDB_00571 0.21 0.20 0.24 5 3300 16 6 10 0 20
PDB_00713 - 0.43 0.43 0.45 9 1996 11 0 11 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 24 5 19 0 23
PDB_00804 - 0.19 0.20 0.18 10 15344 46 10 36 0 40
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 1073 2 0 2 0 9
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.14 2 932 12 2 10 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.52 0.57 0.48 12 2460 13 5 8 0 9
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.31 0.30 0.33 16 12671 34 2 31 1 38
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18
PDB_01092 0.74 0.65 0.83 34 10112 8 1 6 1 18
PDB_01194 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 0 8 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.71 0.63 0.80 12 1161 3 2 1 0 7
PDB_01250 - 0.10 0.10 0.12 4 12056 30 7 23 0 37
PDB_01260 - 0.53 0.44 0.65 11 1813 6 0 6 0 14
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9122 58 7 51 0 39
RFA_00632 0.34 0.36 0.33 10 4065 20 2 18 0 18
RFA_00636 0.43 0.43 0.44 12 3978 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.