CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.844 > 0.661
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.847 ± 0.034 > 0.706 ± 0.377
Sensitivity 0.722 > 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.990 > 0.683
Total TP 96 > 86
Total TN 14636 > 14607
Total FP 3 < 43
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 7
Total FP INCONS 0 < 33
Total FP COMP 2 < 3
Total FN 37 < 47
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 96
Total TN 14636
Total FP 3
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 37
Total Scores
MCC 0.844
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.847 ± 0.034
Sensitivity 0.722
Positive Predictive Value 0.990
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.80 0.65 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 12

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 86
Total TN 14607
Total FP 43
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 47
Total Scores
MCC 0.661
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.706 ± 0.377
Sensitivity 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.683
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.89 0.84 0.95 21 3299 2 1 0 1 4
PDB_00828 0.85 0.81 0.88 22 2460 3 1 2 0 5
PDB_00829 0.78 0.75 0.82 18 2256 4 1 3 0 6
PDB_01020 0.84 0.83 0.86 19 2256 5 1 2 2 4
PDB_01073 0.17 0.18 0.17 6 4336 29 3 26 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.