CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.619 > 0.582
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.049 > 0.456 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.477 > 0.354
Positive Predictive Value 0.810 < 0.962
Total TP 136 > 101
Total TN 37550 < 37613
Total FP 33 > 5
Total FP CONTRA 4 > 3
Total FP INCONS 28 > 1
Total FP COMP 1 = 1
Total FN 149 < 184
P-value 4.42992852122e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 136
Total TN 37550
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 149
Total Scores
MCC 0.619
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.049
Sensitivity 0.477
Positive Predictive Value 0.810
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.59 0.36 1.00 5 941 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_00716 0.60 0.43 0.83 10 2689 2 0 2 0 13
PDB_01092 0.70 0.54 0.90 28 10122 4 0 3 1 24
RFA_00632 0.49 0.32 0.75 9 4083 3 2 1 0 19
RFA_00636 0.49 0.32 0.75 9 3993 3 2 1 0 19
RFA_00767 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00770 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 2003 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 37613
Total FP 5
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 184
Total Scores
MCC 0.582
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.354
Positive Predictive Value 0.962
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2701 0 0 0 0 23
PDB_01092 0.77 0.63 0.94 33 10118 3 1 1 1 19
RFA_00632 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4095 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00636 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4005 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 1 0 0 8
RFA_00770 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 2009 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 1 0 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2016 0 0 0 0 16
RFA_00809 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2145 0 0 0 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.