CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) UNAFold
MCC 0.657 > 0.552
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.047 > 0.552 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.522 > 0.517
Positive Predictive Value 0.833 > 0.597
Total TP 205 > 203
Total TN 48884 > 48790
Total FP 44 < 146
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 24
Total FP INCONS 31 < 113
Total FP COMP 3 < 9
Total FN 188 < 190
P-value 2.30549897711e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 205
Total TN 48884
Total FP 44
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 188
Total Scores
MCC 0.657
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.047
Sensitivity 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.833
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.59 0.36 1.00 5 941 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_00716 0.60 0.43 0.83 10 2689 2 0 2 0 13
PDB_00828 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2466 3 2 1 0 11
PDB_00829 0.75 0.67 0.84 16 2259 3 2 1 0 8
PDB_01020 0.73 0.65 0.83 15 2260 4 2 1 1 8
PDB_01073 0.80 0.65 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 12
PDB_01092 0.70 0.54 0.90 28 10122 4 0 3 1 24
RFA_00632 0.49 0.32 0.75 9 4083 3 2 1 0 19
RFA_00636 0.49 0.32 0.75 9 3993 3 2 1 0 19
RFA_00767 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00770 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 2003 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 203
Total TN 48790
Total FP 146
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 113
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 190
Total Scores
MCC 0.552
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.552 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.517
Positive Predictive Value 0.597
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 24 5 19 0 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18
PDB_01092 0.74 0.65 0.83 34 10112 8 1 6 1 18
RFA_00632 0.34 0.36 0.33 10 4065 20 2 18 0 18
RFA_00636 0.43 0.43 0.44 12 3978 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.