CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAshapes & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAshapes Mastr(20)
MCC 0.640 > 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.389 > 0.572 ± 0.485
Sensitivity 0.571 > 0.459
Positive Predictive Value 0.724 > 0.693
Total TP 76 > 61
Total TN 14628 < 14645
Total FP 31 > 28
Total FP CONTRA 8 > 4
Total FP INCONS 21 < 23
Total FP COMP 2 > 1
Total FN 57 < 72
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Mastr(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 76
Total TN 14628
Total FP 31
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 57
Total Scores
MCC 0.640
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.389
Sensitivity 0.571
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.17 0.16 0.19 4 3300 17 6 11 0 21
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 61
Total TN 14645
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 72
Total Scores
MCC 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.485
Sensitivity 0.459
Positive Predictive Value 0.693
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3302 20 3 16 1 25
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 2261 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01020 0.81 0.65 1.00 15 2263 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_01073 0.34 0.24 0.50 8 4355 8 1 7 0 26

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.