CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAwolf & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAwolf NanoFolder
MCC 0.571 > 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.591 ± 0.201 > 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.560 > 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.589 > 0.281
Total TP 93 > 57
Total TN 18871 > 18826
Total FP 75 < 159
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 22
Total FP INCONS 52 < 124
Total FP COMP 10 < 13
Total FN 73 < 109
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAwolf and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAwolf and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 18871
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 73
Total Scores
MCC 0.571
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.591 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.560
Positive Predictive Value 0.589
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.89 0.84 0.95 21 3299 2 1 0 1 4
PDB_00828 0.85 0.81 0.88 22 2460 3 1 2 0 5
PDB_00851 - 0.34 0.34 0.35 14 4713 26 0 26 0 27
PDB_01009 0.45 0.52 0.39 11 2457 18 6 11 1 10
RFA_00770 0.51 0.50 0.53 9 1999 12 2 6 4 9
RFA_00773 0.42 0.39 0.47 7 1938 12 1 7 4 11
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 2 0 0 7

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 18826
Total FP 159
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 124
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 109
Total Scores
MCC 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.281
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_00851 - 0.16 0.17 0.17 7 4711 35 3 32 0 34
PDB_01009 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2455 25 3 20 2 14
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.