CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.672 > 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.248 > 0.666 ± 0.368
Sensitivity 0.549 < 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.830 > 0.733
Total TP 73 < 77
Total TN 14645 > 14628
Total FP 17 < 30
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 8
Total FP INCONS 9 < 20
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 60 > 56
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 73
Total TN 14645
Total FP 17
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 60
Total Scores
MCC 0.672
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.248
Sensitivity 0.549
Positive Predictive Value 0.830
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.66 0.56 0.78 14 3303 5 0 4 1 11
PDB_00828 0.82 0.74 0.91 20 2463 2 2 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.70 0.63 0.79 15 2259 4 2 2 0 9
PDB_01020 0.84 0.78 0.90 18 2258 3 2 0 1 5
PDB_01073 0.34 0.18 0.67 6 4362 3 0 3 0 28

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 77
Total TN 14628
Total FP 30
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 56
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.666 ± 0.368
Sensitivity 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.733
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.21 0.20 0.24 5 3300 16 6 10 0 20
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.