CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.514 > 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.084 > 0.502 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.427 < 0.461
Positive Predictive Value 0.625 > 0.523
Total TP 168 < 181
Total TN 48861 > 48784
Total FP 105 < 189
Total FP CONTRA 41 > 26
Total FP INCONS 60 < 139
Total FP COMP 4 < 24
Total FN 225 > 212
P-value 3.10499527239e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(seed) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 168
Total TN 48861
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 225
Total Scores
MCC 0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.71 0.57 0.89 8 937 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00716 0.59 0.48 0.73 11 2686 4 0 4 0 12
PDB_00828 0.54 0.41 0.73 11 2470 4 2 2 0 16
PDB_00829 0.74 0.63 0.88 15 2261 2 2 0 0 9
PDB_01020 0.76 0.65 0.88 15 2261 2 2 0 0 8
PDB_01073 0.39 0.18 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 28
PDB_01092 0.48 0.37 0.63 19 10123 13 1 10 2 33
RFA_00632 0.47 0.39 0.58 11 4076 8 3 5 0 17
RFA_00636 0.62 0.54 0.71 15 3984 6 3 3 0 13
RFA_00767 0.19 0.17 0.23 3 1878 10 3 7 0 15
RFA_00768 0.19 0.17 0.23 3 1878 10 3 7 0 15
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 4 2 0 8
RFA_00770 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1997 9 6 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 6 3 0 9
RFA_00779 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 6 3 0 9
RFA_00808 0.60 0.50 0.73 8 2005 4 0 3 1 8
RFA_00809 0.37 0.31 0.45 5 2134 7 0 6 1 11

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 181
Total TN 48784
Total FP 189
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 139
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 212
Total Scores
MCC 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.502 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.461
Positive Predictive Value 0.523
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 6 0 5 1 9
PDB_00716 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2685 3 0 3 0 10
PDB_00828 0.85 0.81 0.88 22 2460 3 1 2 0 5
PDB_00829 0.78 0.75 0.82 18 2256 4 1 3 0 6
PDB_01020 0.84 0.83 0.86 19 2256 5 1 2 2 4
PDB_01073 0.17 0.18 0.17 6 4336 29 3 26 0 28
PDB_01092 0.43 0.38 0.49 20 10112 23 2 19 2 32
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.27 7 4069 22 1 18 3 21
RFA_00636 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 3978 19 1 15 3 17
RFA_00767 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 8 1 5 2 10
RFA_00769 0.41 0.44 0.38 8 1932 13 3 10 0 10
RFA_00770 0.51 0.50 0.53 9 1999 12 2 6 4 9
RFA_00773 0.42 0.39 0.47 7 1938 12 1 7 4 11
RFA_00779 0.26 0.28 0.26 5 1934 14 6 8 0 13
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 2 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 6 0 4 2 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.