CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold RNAwolf
MCC 0.412 > 0.362
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.082 > 0.397 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.390 > 0.353
Positive Predictive Value 0.443 > 0.380
Total TP 460 > 416
Total TN 158467 > 158411
Total FP 591 < 724
Total FP CONTRA 86 < 111
Total FP INCONS 493 < 568
Total FP COMP 12 < 45
Total FN 718 < 762
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 460
Total TN 158467
Total FP 591
Total FP CONTRA 86
Total FP INCONS 493
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 718
Total Scores
MCC 0.412
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.443
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.59 0.50 0.71 5 489 2 0 2 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1210 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00370 - 0.09 0.12 0.07 3 15179 45 12 31 2 22
PDB_00447 - 0.44 0.39 0.52 17 7107 16 6 10 0 27
PDB_00571 0.21 0.20 0.24 5 3300 16 6 10 0 20
PDB_00713 - 0.43 0.43 0.45 9 1996 11 0 11 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 24 5 19 0 23
PDB_00804 - 0.19 0.20 0.18 10 15344 46 10 36 0 40
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 1073 2 0 2 0 9
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.14 2 932 12 2 10 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.52 0.57 0.48 12 2460 13 5 8 0 9
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.31 0.30 0.33 16 12671 34 2 31 1 38
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18
PDB_01092 0.74 0.65 0.83 34 10112 8 1 6 1 18
PDB_01194 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 0 8 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.71 0.63 0.80 12 1161 3 2 1 0 7
PDB_01250 - 0.10 0.10 0.12 4 12056 30 7 23 0 37
PDB_01260 - 0.53 0.44 0.65 11 1813 6 0 6 0 14
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9122 58 7 51 0 39
RFA_00632 0.34 0.36 0.33 10 4065 20 2 18 0 18
RFA_00636 0.43 0.43 0.44 12 3978 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 416
Total TN 158411
Total FP 724
Total FP CONTRA 111
Total FP INCONS 568
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 762
Total Scores
MCC 0.362
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.397 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.353
Positive Predictive Value 0.380
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 6 0 5 1 9
PDB_00018 - 0.18 0.15 0.25 3 1023 9 2 7 0 17
PDB_00020 - 0.39 0.35 0.47 7 765 8 0 8 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.61 0.50 0.75 6 622 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 615 15 0 15 0 16
PDB_00123 - 0.31 0.33 0.30 12 4146 28 4 24 0 24
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 485 11 2 9 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 486 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 3 0 1 2 3
PDB_00138 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 371 7 0 7 0 8
PDB_00209 - 0.74 0.55 1.00 6 555 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00243 - 0.54 0.42 0.71 5 623 2 0 2 0 7
PDB_00352 - 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1211 3 0 3 0 8
PDB_00370 - 0.34 0.48 0.25 12 15177 42 23 13 6 13
PDB_00447 - 0.22 0.20 0.25 9 7104 27 2 25 0 35
PDB_00571 0.89 0.84 0.95 21 3299 2 1 0 1 4
PDB_00713 - 0.28 0.24 0.33 5 2001 11 0 10 1 16
PDB_00716 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2685 3 0 3 0 10
PDB_00804 - 0.23 0.24 0.22 12 15345 53 6 37 10 38
PDB_00828 0.85 0.81 0.88 22 2460 3 1 2 0 5
PDB_00829 0.78 0.75 0.82 18 2256 4 1 3 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.34 0.34 0.35 14 4713 26 0 26 0 27
PDB_00857 - 0.57 0.60 0.56 9 1065 7 0 7 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 928 18 0 18 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4143 43 4 39 0 40
PDB_00918 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 317 8 0 8 0 7
PDB_01009 0.45 0.52 0.39 11 2457 18 6 11 1 10
PDB_01020 0.84 0.83 0.86 19 2256 5 1 2 2 4
PDB_01040 - 0.24 0.25 0.25 5 1108 15 1 14 0 15
PDB_01059 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 226 5 1 4 0 7
PDB_01070 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12665 55 8 47 0 54
PDB_01073 0.17 0.18 0.17 6 4336 29 3 26 0 28
PDB_01092 0.43 0.38 0.49 20 10112 23 2 19 2 32
PDB_01194 - 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_01201 - 0.75 0.68 0.83 15 1110 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_01203 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1165 11 0 11 0 19
PDB_01250 - 0.45 0.44 0.46 18 12051 21 11 10 0 23
PDB_01260 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1809 21 0 21 0 25
PDB_01281 - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 365 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.65 0.53 0.80 8 893 2 0 2 0 7
PDB_01309 - 0.26 0.31 0.22 12 9126 42 14 28 0 27
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.27 7 4069 22 1 18 3 21
RFA_00636 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 3978 19 1 15 3 17
RFA_00767 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 8 1 5 2 10
RFA_00769 0.41 0.44 0.38 8 1932 13 3 10 0 10
RFA_00770 0.51 0.50 0.53 9 1999 12 2 6 4 9
RFA_00773 0.42 0.39 0.47 7 1938 12 1 7 4 11
RFA_00779 0.26 0.28 0.26 5 1934 14 6 8 0 13
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 2 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 6 0 4 2 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.