CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold5 & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold5 Contrafold
MCC 0.534 > 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.089 > 0.525 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.505 > 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.572 > 0.491
Total TP 595 > 512
Total TN 158465 > 158463
Total FP 457 < 548
Total FP CONTRA 74 > 63
Total FP INCONS 372 < 468
Total FP COMP 11 < 17
Total FN 583 < 666
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold5 and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold5 and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 595
Total TN 158465
Total FP 457
Total FP CONTRA 74
Total FP INCONS 372
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 583
Total Scores
MCC 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.505
Positive Predictive Value 0.572
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 1 2 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.68 0.55 0.85 11 1022 2 2 0 0 9
PDB_00020 - 0.80 0.70 0.93 14 765 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00041 - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 619 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_00053 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 424 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00056 - 0.90 0.81 1.00 13 617 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00123 - 0.35 0.33 0.38 12 4154 20 0 20 0 24
PDB_00124 - 0.86 0.90 0.82 9 485 2 2 0 0 1
PDB_00128 - 0.61 0.57 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 6
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.96 1.00 0.92 11 549 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00243 - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 619 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_00352 - 0.72 0.68 0.76 13 1208 4 3 1 0 6
PDB_00370 - 0.10 0.12 0.08 3 15187 35 16 19 0 22
PDB_00447 - 0.95 0.91 1.00 40 7100 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.69 0.62 0.76 13 1999 4 0 4 0 8
PDB_00716 0.17 0.17 0.18 4 2679 19 0 18 1 19
PDB_00804 - 0.19 0.20 0.18 10 15344 48 6 40 2 40
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.83 0.79 0.86 19 2256 3 2 1 0 5
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.54 0.44 0.67 18 4726 9 0 9 0 23
PDB_00857 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1066 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 932 14 0 14 0 20
PDB_00886 - 0.64 0.60 0.69 24 4151 11 0 11 0 16
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 3 0 2 1 2
PDB_01020 0.82 0.78 0.86 18 2257 4 2 1 1 5
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.33 6 1110 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.43 0.37 0.50 20 12680 20 0 20 0 34
PDB_01073 0.56 0.47 0.67 16 4347 9 1 7 1 18
PDB_01092 0.73 0.69 0.77 36 10106 12 2 9 1 16
PDB_01194 - 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.79 0.64 1.00 14 1114 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_01203 - 0.73 0.63 0.86 12 1162 2 2 0 0 7
PDB_01250 - 0.16 0.15 0.18 6 12056 30 3 25 2 35
PDB_01260 - 0.41 0.36 0.47 9 1811 10 0 10 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.90 0.87 0.93 13 889 1 1 0 0 2
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9125 55 12 43 0 39
RFA_00632 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4073 22 0 22 0 28
RFA_00636 0.58 0.57 0.59 16 3978 11 1 10 0 12
RFA_00767 0.21 0.22 0.22 4 1873 14 2 12 0 14
RFA_00768 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1875 16 1 15 0 18
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 2003 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1936 19 1 16 2 18
RFA_00779 0.69 0.61 0.79 11 1939 3 3 0 0 7
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.45 0.44 0.47 7 2130 8 1 7 0 9

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 512
Total TN 158463
Total FP 548
Total FP CONTRA 63
Total FP INCONS 468
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 666
Total Scores
MCC 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.491
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.18 0.20 0.20 4 1015 16 2 14 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.25 0.25 0.29 4 616 10 0 10 0 12
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 486 10 2 8 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00370 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15185 40 4 36 0 25
PDB_00447 - 0.66 0.55 0.80 24 7110 6 6 0 0 20
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1996 8 1 7 0 9
PDB_00716 0.33 0.30 0.37 7 2682 13 0 12 1 16
PDB_00804 - 0.22 0.24 0.21 12 15342 46 10 36 0 38
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_00829 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 2259 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.44 0.39 0.50 16 4721 16 0 16 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 1071 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 928 19 0 18 1 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4146 40 0 40 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
PDB_01020 0.81 0.74 0.89 17 2259 3 1 1 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.29 0.30 0.30 6 1108 14 0 14 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.41 0.37 0.45 20 12676 24 0 24 0 34
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
PDB_01092 0.70 0.65 0.76 34 10108 14 2 9 3 18
PDB_01194 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 485 11 0 11 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.70 0.68 0.72 13 1158 5 3 2 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.17 0.15 0.21 6 12061 23 5 18 0 35
PDB_01260 - 0.64 0.56 0.74 14 1811 5 1 4 0 11
PDB_01281 - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 364 14 0 14 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9117 64 9 54 1 39
RFA_00632 0.38 0.39 0.37 11 4065 19 0 19 0 17
RFA_00636 0.60 0.64 0.56 18 3973 14 4 10 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 0 8 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.