CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold5 & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold5 UNAFold
MCC 0.534 > 0.412
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.089 > 0.492 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.505 > 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.572 > 0.443
Total TP 595 > 460
Total TN 158465 < 158467
Total FP 457 < 591
Total FP CONTRA 74 < 86
Total FP INCONS 372 < 493
Total FP COMP 11 < 12
Total FN 583 < 718
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold5 and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold5 and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 595
Total TN 158465
Total FP 457
Total FP CONTRA 74
Total FP INCONS 372
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 583
Total Scores
MCC 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.505
Positive Predictive Value 0.572
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 1 2 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.68 0.55 0.85 11 1022 2 2 0 0 9
PDB_00020 - 0.80 0.70 0.93 14 765 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00041 - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 619 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_00053 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 424 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00056 - 0.90 0.81 1.00 13 617 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00123 - 0.35 0.33 0.38 12 4154 20 0 20 0 24
PDB_00124 - 0.86 0.90 0.82 9 485 2 2 0 0 1
PDB_00128 - 0.61 0.57 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 6
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.96 1.00 0.92 11 549 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00243 - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 619 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_00352 - 0.72 0.68 0.76 13 1208 4 3 1 0 6
PDB_00370 - 0.10 0.12 0.08 3 15187 35 16 19 0 22
PDB_00447 - 0.95 0.91 1.00 40 7100 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.69 0.62 0.76 13 1999 4 0 4 0 8
PDB_00716 0.17 0.17 0.18 4 2679 19 0 18 1 19
PDB_00804 - 0.19 0.20 0.18 10 15344 48 6 40 2 40
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.83 0.79 0.86 19 2256 3 2 1 0 5
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.54 0.44 0.67 18 4726 9 0 9 0 23
PDB_00857 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1066 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 932 14 0 14 0 20
PDB_00886 - 0.64 0.60 0.69 24 4151 11 0 11 0 16
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 3 0 2 1 2
PDB_01020 0.82 0.78 0.86 18 2257 4 2 1 1 5
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.33 6 1110 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.43 0.37 0.50 20 12680 20 0 20 0 34
PDB_01073 0.56 0.47 0.67 16 4347 9 1 7 1 18
PDB_01092 0.73 0.69 0.77 36 10106 12 2 9 1 16
PDB_01194 - 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.79 0.64 1.00 14 1114 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_01203 - 0.73 0.63 0.86 12 1162 2 2 0 0 7
PDB_01250 - 0.16 0.15 0.18 6 12056 30 3 25 2 35
PDB_01260 - 0.41 0.36 0.47 9 1811 10 0 10 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.90 0.87 0.93 13 889 1 1 0 0 2
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9125 55 12 43 0 39
RFA_00632 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4073 22 0 22 0 28
RFA_00636 0.58 0.57 0.59 16 3978 11 1 10 0 12
RFA_00767 0.21 0.22 0.22 4 1873 14 2 12 0 14
RFA_00768 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1875 16 1 15 0 18
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 2003 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1936 19 1 16 2 18
RFA_00779 0.69 0.61 0.79 11 1939 3 3 0 0 7
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.45 0.44 0.47 7 2130 8 1 7 0 9

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 460
Total TN 158467
Total FP 591
Total FP CONTRA 86
Total FP INCONS 493
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 718
Total Scores
MCC 0.412
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.443
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.59 0.50 0.71 5 489 2 0 2 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1210 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00370 - 0.09 0.12 0.07 3 15179 45 12 31 2 22
PDB_00447 - 0.44 0.39 0.52 17 7107 16 6 10 0 27
PDB_00571 0.21 0.20 0.24 5 3300 16 6 10 0 20
PDB_00713 - 0.43 0.43 0.45 9 1996 11 0 11 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 24 5 19 0 23
PDB_00804 - 0.19 0.20 0.18 10 15344 46 10 36 0 40
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 1073 2 0 2 0 9
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.14 2 932 12 2 10 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.52 0.57 0.48 12 2460 13 5 8 0 9
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.31 0.30 0.33 16 12671 34 2 31 1 38
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18
PDB_01092 0.74 0.65 0.83 34 10112 8 1 6 1 18
PDB_01194 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 0 8 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.71 0.63 0.80 12 1161 3 2 1 0 7
PDB_01250 - 0.10 0.10 0.12 4 12056 30 7 23 0 37
PDB_01260 - 0.53 0.44 0.65 11 1813 6 0 6 0 14
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9122 58 7 51 0 39
RFA_00632 0.34 0.36 0.33 10 4065 20 2 18 0 18
RFA_00636 0.43 0.43 0.44 12 3978 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.