CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.534 > 0.346
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.521 ± 0.121 > 0.354 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.528 > 0.160
Positive Predictive Value 0.543 < 0.753
Total TP 694 > 210
Total TN 914471 < 915471
Total FP 755 > 76
Total FP CONTRA 118 > 3
Total FP INCONS 467 > 66
Total FP COMP 170 > 7
Total FN 621 < 1105
P-value 1.5677163434e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 694
Total TN 914471
Total FP 755
Total FP CONTRA 118
Total FP INCONS 467
Total FP COMP 170
Total FN 621
Total Scores
MCC 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.521 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.528
Positive Predictive Value 0.543
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.22 0.22 0.22 25 103625 113 13 77 23 90
CRW_00016 0.65 0.62 0.69 74 77313 47 5 29 13 46
CRW_00610 0.42 0.42 0.43 34 36235 46 6 40 0 47
CRW_00613 0.46 0.42 0.51 33 34915 41 2 30 9 45
CRW_00614 0.07 0.09 0.06 5 121689 141 24 53 64 52
CRW_00633 0.45 0.44 0.47 47 63445 58 10 44 4 59
CRW_00670 0.77 0.74 0.81 89 70015 26 0 21 5 31
CRW_00671 0.66 0.64 0.68 75 62725 41 8 27 6 42
CRW_00672 0.74 0.73 0.74 81 72281 36 10 18 8 30
CRW_00674 0.55 0.55 0.55 68 83312 61 8 48 5 56
CRW_00676 0.54 0.56 0.52 64 93406 75 17 41 17 51
CRW_00692 0.57 0.57 0.57 51 68545 54 15 24 15 39
PDB_00827 0.67 0.59 0.76 48 26965 16 0 15 1 33

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 210
Total TN 915471
Total FP 76
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 1105
Total Scores
MCC 0.346
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.354 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.160
Positive Predictive Value 0.753
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.