CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.678 > 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.675 ± 0.027 > 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.540 > 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.853 > 0.695
Total TP 2393 > 1886
Total TN 2904246 < 2904341
Total FP 512 < 1026
Total FP CONTRA 143 < 246
Total FP INCONS 271 < 580
Total FP COMP 98 < 200
Total FN 2040 < 2547
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2393
Total TN 2904246
Total FP 512
Total FP CONTRA 143
Total FP INCONS 271
Total FP COMP 98
Total FN 2040
Total Scores
MCC 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.675 ± 0.027
Sensitivity 0.540
Positive Predictive Value 0.853
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.79 0.65 0.97 58 45391 2 0 2 0 31
ASE_00090 0.76 0.58 1.00 59 55552 0 0 0 0 42
ASE_00135 0.58 0.43 0.78 47 63130 13 0 13 0 62
ASE_00153 0.34 0.26 0.45 19 57588 23 4 19 0 54
ASE_00215 0.56 0.37 0.84 37 48472 7 0 7 0 62
ASE_00328 0.78 0.62 0.99 69 72701 6 0 1 5 43
ASE_00361 0.65 0.42 1.00 53 75413 0 0 0 0 74
ASE_00441 0.62 0.41 0.94 46 64212 4 0 3 1 66
TMR_00017 0.80 0.65 0.99 66 67094 1 0 1 0 36
TMR_00018 0.65 0.54 0.78 50 64556 15 5 9 1 42
TMR_00042 0.66 0.53 0.83 52 62772 12 4 7 1 46
TMR_00046 0.53 0.45 0.63 43 62767 26 4 21 1 53
TMR_00048 0.66 0.53 0.82 50 64919 12 7 4 1 45
TMR_00080 0.63 0.52 0.77 50 70435 15 8 7 0 46
TMR_00082 0.66 0.56 0.78 54 67827 18 7 8 3 42
TMR_00123 0.79 0.64 0.97 65 66363 3 1 1 1 36
TMR_00137 0.68 0.55 0.83 49 61016 13 6 4 3 40
TMR_00142 0.65 0.46 0.92 47 70825 11 0 4 7 55
TMR_00207 0.74 0.57 0.97 59 72329 4 1 1 2 44
TMR_00257 0.78 0.64 0.94 63 67094 4 4 0 0 35
TMR_00271 0.55 0.44 0.68 40 64202 24 6 13 5 51
TMR_00332 0.67 0.48 0.92 48 67109 5 1 3 1 51
TMR_00366 0.70 0.49 1.00 49 67847 7 0 0 7 51
TMR_00378 0.63 0.46 0.87 45 67844 15 1 6 8 52
TMR_00404 0.60 0.50 0.72 46 67464 21 3 15 3 46
TMR_00427 0.63 0.45 0.86 44 67477 8 7 0 1 53
TMR_00443 0.73 0.58 0.92 60 67096 6 0 5 1 44
TMR_00451 0.63 0.55 0.73 49 63479 20 10 8 2 40
TMR_00458 0.65 0.54 0.79 50 63483 15 6 7 2 43
TMR_00469 0.79 0.69 0.91 69 64544 10 6 1 3 31
TMR_00472 0.72 0.64 0.82 62 64544 15 7 7 1 35
TMR_00519 0.63 0.53 0.75 50 63123 19 5 12 2 45
TMR_00520 0.63 0.48 0.81 48 63131 13 3 8 2 51
TMR_00522 0.62 0.47 0.82 46 63134 15 4 6 5 51
TMR_00528 0.67 0.54 0.84 52 63128 15 4 6 5 45
TMR_00540 0.60 0.45 0.81 47 73478 11 4 7 0 57
TMR_00568 0.77 0.68 0.87 67 60649 15 1 9 5 32
TMR_00571 0.80 0.71 0.91 70 60649 12 1 6 5 29
TMR_00580 0.78 0.68 0.89 68 60650 13 2 6 5 32
TMR_00584 0.80 0.70 0.91 68 61000 10 3 4 3 29
TMR_00586 0.74 0.66 0.83 64 60998 18 6 7 5 33
TMR_00616 0.74 0.65 0.85 64 67086 12 7 4 1 35
TMR_00699 0.66 0.49 0.89 50 67105 6 1 5 0 52
TMR_00702 0.60 0.45 0.79 45 67104 12 2 10 0 55
TMR_00703 0.71 0.57 0.90 56 67466 6 2 4 0 43

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.