CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.676 > 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.673 ± 0.023 > 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.532 > 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.861 > 0.695
Total TP 2357 > 1886
Total TN 2904315 < 2904341
Total FP 637 < 1026
Total FP CONTRA 79 < 246
Total FP INCONS 302 < 580
Total FP COMP 256 > 200
Total FN 2076 < 2547
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2357
Total TN 2904315
Total FP 637
Total FP CONTRA 79
Total FP INCONS 302
Total FP COMP 256
Total FN 2076
Total Scores
MCC 0.676
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.673 ± 0.023
Sensitivity 0.532
Positive Predictive Value 0.861
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.75 0.61 0.93 54 45393 8 0 4 4 35
ASE_00090 0.69 0.60 0.78 61 55533 17 1 16 0 40
ASE_00135 0.64 0.46 0.89 50 63134 7 1 5 1 59
ASE_00153 0.54 0.48 0.60 35 57572 43 2 21 20 38
ASE_00215 0.62 0.40 0.95 40 48474 3 1 1 1 59
ASE_00328 0.80 0.66 0.97 74 72695 9 0 2 7 38
ASE_00361 0.65 0.43 0.96 55 75409 4 0 2 2 72
ASE_00441 0.63 0.44 0.91 49 64207 9 0 5 4 63
TMR_00017 0.72 0.55 0.93 56 67101 8 0 4 4 46
TMR_00018 0.71 0.60 0.85 55 64555 14 2 8 4 37
TMR_00042 0.74 0.64 0.85 63 62761 15 1 10 4 35
TMR_00046 0.64 0.53 0.77 51 62769 20 3 12 5 45
TMR_00048 0.73 0.63 0.85 60 64909 18 2 9 7 35
TMR_00080 0.60 0.36 0.97 35 70464 1 0 1 0 61
TMR_00082 0.65 0.44 0.95 42 67852 3 0 2 1 54
TMR_00123 0.69 0.55 0.86 56 66365 14 0 9 5 45
TMR_00137 0.47 0.28 0.78 25 61043 12 1 6 5 64
TMR_00142 0.61 0.55 0.68 56 70794 33 7 19 7 46
TMR_00207 0.76 0.60 0.95 62 72325 7 0 3 4 41
TMR_00257 0.71 0.54 0.93 53 67104 10 0 4 6 45
TMR_00271 0.54 0.35 0.82 32 64222 15 3 4 8 59
TMR_00332 0.75 0.62 0.92 61 67095 10 0 5 5 38
TMR_00366 0.65 0.57 0.74 57 67819 31 5 15 11 43
TMR_00378 0.63 0.53 0.76 51 67829 26 6 10 10 46
TMR_00404 0.66 0.57 0.76 52 67460 27 3 13 11 40
TMR_00427 0.73 0.59 0.90 57 67465 11 5 1 5 40
TMR_00443 0.69 0.55 0.86 57 67095 13 1 8 4 47
TMR_00451 0.54 0.36 0.80 32 63506 12 3 5 4 57
TMR_00458 0.61 0.41 0.90 38 63504 7 3 1 3 55
TMR_00469 0.79 0.70 0.90 70 64542 11 4 4 3 30
TMR_00472 0.77 0.66 0.89 64 64548 13 5 3 5 33
TMR_00519 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 63135 20 2 9 9 51
TMR_00520 0.60 0.47 0.76 47 63128 24 3 12 9 52
TMR_00522 0.65 0.47 0.88 46 63138 14 2 4 8 51
TMR_00528 0.60 0.46 0.78 45 63132 22 4 9 9 52
TMR_00540 0.69 0.54 0.88 56 73472 11 2 6 3 48
TMR_00568 0.69 0.54 0.88 53 60666 15 0 7 8 46
TMR_00571 0.66 0.49 0.89 49 60671 14 1 5 8 50
TMR_00580 0.65 0.49 0.88 49 60670 14 1 6 7 51
TMR_00584 0.72 0.57 0.92 55 61015 13 1 4 8 42
TMR_00586 0.70 0.56 0.89 54 61014 14 1 6 7 43
TMR_00616 0.76 0.63 0.91 62 67093 11 0 6 5 37
TMR_00699 0.76 0.63 0.91 64 67091 11 1 5 5 38
TMR_00702 0.77 0.65 0.90 65 67089 12 1 6 5 35
TMR_00703 0.78 0.66 0.92 65 67457 11 1 5 5 34

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.