CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.708 > 0.350
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.676 ± 0.129 > 0.358 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.665 > 0.159
Positive Predictive Value 0.756 < 0.770
Total TP 977 > 234
Total TN 1035357 < 1036346
Total FP 427 > 77
Total FP CONTRA 73 > 3
Total FP INCONS 243 > 67
Total FP COMP 111 > 7
Total FN 493 < 1236
P-value 2.32677072069e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 977
Total TN 1035357
Total FP 427
Total FP CONTRA 73
Total FP INCONS 243
Total FP COMP 111
Total FN 493
Total Scores
MCC 0.708
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.676 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.665
Positive Predictive Value 0.756
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.67 0.60 0.76 69 103649 34 4 18 12 46
CRW_00016 0.81 0.73 0.92 87 77326 14 3 5 6 33
CRW_00610 0.87 0.80 0.94 65 36246 7 1 3 3 16
CRW_00613 0.47 0.42 0.53 33 34918 36 3 26 7 45
CRW_00614 0.14 0.14 0.14 8 121715 98 13 35 50 49
CRW_00618 0.21 0.21 0.21 13 56218 64 9 40 15 48
CRW_00633 0.81 0.75 0.86 80 63453 15 4 9 2 26
CRW_00634 0.62 0.62 0.62 58 64526 36 9 27 0 36
CRW_00670 0.86 0.83 0.90 99 70015 11 4 7 0 21
CRW_00671 0.83 0.79 0.88 92 62731 12 3 9 0 25
CRW_00672 0.86 0.84 0.89 93 72285 13 4 8 1 18
CRW_00674 0.81 0.77 0.85 95 83324 19 1 16 2 29
CRW_00676 0.60 0.57 0.63 66 93424 41 9 29 3 49
CRW_00692 0.77 0.73 0.81 66 68554 24 6 9 9 24
PDB_00827 0.79 0.65 0.96 53 26973 3 0 2 1 28

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 234
Total TN 1036346
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 1236
Total Scores
MCC 0.350
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.358 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.159
Positive Predictive Value 0.770
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.