CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.576 > 0.350
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.561 ± 0.105 > 0.358 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.556 > 0.159
Positive Predictive Value 0.597 < 0.770
Total TP 817 > 234
Total TN 1035282 < 1036346
Total FP 737 > 77
Total FP CONTRA 106 > 3
Total FP INCONS 445 > 67
Total FP COMP 186 > 7
Total FN 653 < 1236
P-value 2.32677072069e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 817
Total TN 1035282
Total FP 737
Total FP CONTRA 106
Total FP INCONS 445
Total FP COMP 186
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.561 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.556
Positive Predictive Value 0.597
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.43 0.39 0.47 45 103644 80 11 40 29 70
CRW_00016 0.73 0.68 0.79 81 77319 37 0 21 16 39
CRW_00610 0.50 0.49 0.51 40 36237 41 9 29 3 41
CRW_00613 0.79 0.77 0.81 60 34906 22 1 13 8 18
CRW_00614 0.24 0.25 0.23 14 121709 121 7 41 73 43
CRW_00618 0.20 0.21 0.19 13 56213 75 8 46 21 48
CRW_00633 0.58 0.55 0.62 58 63453 37 8 27 2 48
CRW_00634 0.58 0.59 0.57 55 64524 43 12 29 2 39
CRW_00670 0.76 0.71 0.83 85 70022 19 0 18 1 35
CRW_00671 0.73 0.70 0.77 82 62728 31 1 24 6 35
CRW_00672 0.53 0.52 0.55 58 72284 55 8 40 7 53
CRW_00674 0.70 0.66 0.74 82 83325 34 5 24 5 42
CRW_00676 0.42 0.44 0.40 51 93400 81 20 57 4 64
CRW_00692 0.45 0.44 0.47 40 68549 53 16 30 7 50
PDB_00827 0.77 0.65 0.90 53 26969 8 0 6 2 28

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 234
Total TN 1036346
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 1236
Total Scores
MCC 0.350
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.358 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.159
Positive Predictive Value 0.770
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.