CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.629 > 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.033 > 0.151 ± 0.029
Sensitivity 0.554 > 0.174
Positive Predictive Value 0.716 > 0.135
Total TP 2862 > 901
Total TN 2956476 > 2953821
Total FP 1414 < 5867
Total FP CONTRA 224 < 780
Total FP INCONS 911 < 4971
Total FP COMP 279 > 116
Total FN 2303 < 4264
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2862
Total TN 2956476
Total FP 1414
Total FP CONTRA 224
Total FP INCONS 911
Total FP COMP 279
Total FN 2303
Total Scores
MCC 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.033
Sensitivity 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.716
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.74 0.67 0.81 74 62390 24 2 15 7 36
ASE_00185 0.50 0.37 0.69 47 73468 24 3 18 3 81
ASE_00190 0.52 0.42 0.64 38 45392 24 5 16 3 52
ASE_00221 0.64 0.59 0.69 69 64520 34 1 30 3 48
ASE_00228 0.69 0.64 0.75 55 46898 26 4 14 8 31
ASE_00229 0.79 0.70 0.88 61 42417 14 3 5 6 26
ASE_00231 0.57 0.46 0.70 44 47832 24 1 18 5 52
ASE_00234 0.59 0.47 0.73 61 75383 27 3 19 5 68
ASE_00238 0.61 0.49 0.77 56 64188 22 4 13 5 58
ASE_00248 0.74 0.68 0.80 78 62383 26 1 19 6 36
ASE_00254 0.75 0.65 0.87 53 36795 12 4 4 4 29
ASE_00255 0.65 0.59 0.71 77 74583 34 3 28 3 53
ASE_00257 0.60 0.52 0.70 50 50969 30 3 18 9 47
ASE_00267 0.75 0.67 0.84 59 45080 20 1 10 9 29
ASE_00270 0.43 0.30 0.61 38 72328 27 1 23 3 90
ASE_00274 0.66 0.50 0.85 52 55550 14 2 7 5 51
ASE_00277 0.73 0.56 0.96 51 48152 6 0 2 4 40
ASE_00279 0.78 0.71 0.86 72 53217 19 3 9 7 29
ASE_00285 0.58 0.48 0.70 58 68923 28 4 21 3 64
ASE_00287 0.71 0.64 0.79 66 54862 25 3 15 7 37
ASE_00294 0.68 0.59 0.79 101 114353 34 1 26 7 70
ASE_00298 0.46 0.40 0.54 45 67445 43 7 31 5 68
ASE_00318 0.76 0.69 0.84 81 80103 31 6 10 15 37
ASE_00335 0.69 0.63 0.76 73 75370 33 5 18 10 43
ASE_00340 0.54 0.47 0.62 40 45991 32 4 21 7 45
ASE_00367 0.75 0.70 0.81 60 42997 20 3 11 6 26
ASE_00370 0.87 0.82 0.92 69 41830 14 0 6 8 15
ASE_00372 0.48 0.41 0.55 41 51929 36 4 29 3 59
ASE_00376 0.55 0.51 0.60 54 56863 38 3 33 2 51
ASE_00377 0.78 0.69 0.88 74 57546 13 4 6 3 33
ASE_00386 0.71 0.63 0.80 60 50328 22 1 14 7 36
ASE_00393 0.68 0.59 0.77 55 47824 21 1 15 5 38
ASE_00412 0.59 0.50 0.70 52 58237 28 2 20 6 53
ASE_00413 0.65 0.60 0.69 49 44480 29 5 17 7 32
ASE_00416 0.59 0.51 0.68 65 77325 36 6 25 5 62
ASE_00422 0.74 0.63 0.87 59 46903 14 2 7 5 35
ASE_00428 0.64 0.58 0.70 73 76532 38 6 25 7 52
ASE_00430 0.69 0.59 0.81 57 46901 18 2 11 5 40
ASE_00437 0.59 0.50 0.69 68 79302 35 0 31 4 67
ASE_00451 0.79 0.70 0.89 87 70778 16 3 8 5 38
TMR_00123 0.66 0.53 0.81 54 66363 23 2 11 10 47
TMR_00399 0.38 0.35 0.40 33 64898 53 16 33 4 61
TMR_00443 0.59 0.55 0.63 57 67070 36 15 19 2 47
TMR_00469 0.62 0.60 0.65 60 64527 38 14 19 5 40
TMR_00519 0.38 0.40 0.37 38 63086 68 19 47 2 57
TMR_00528 0.39 0.40 0.38 39 63088 65 19 44 2 58
TMR_00571 0.60 0.56 0.65 55 60641 42 5 25 12 44
TMR_00584 0.61 0.57 0.66 55 60992 39 5 23 11 42
TMR_00703 0.54 0.49 0.58 49 67444 39 13 22 4 50

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 901
Total TN 2953821
Total FP 5867
Total FP CONTRA 780
Total FP INCONS 4971
Total FP COMP 116
Total FN 4264
Total Scores
MCC 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.151 ± 0.029
Sensitivity 0.174
Positive Predictive Value 0.135
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.22 0.25 0.20 27 62347 108 12 95 1 83
ASE_00185 0.17 0.19 0.16 24 73382 134 14 116 4 104
ASE_00190 0.24 0.28 0.21 25 45334 93 14 78 1 65
ASE_00221 0.20 0.21 0.18 25 64484 112 10 101 1 92
ASE_00228 0.05 0.06 0.04 5 46858 109 17 91 1 81
ASE_00229 0.12 0.14 0.11 12 42380 97 12 82 3 75
ASE_00231 0.37 0.42 0.33 40 47773 84 17 65 2 56
ASE_00234 0.25 0.27 0.23 35 75315 117 10 106 1 94
ASE_00238 0.26 0.30 0.23 34 64111 119 18 98 3 80
ASE_00248 0.13 0.15 0.12 17 62340 124 9 115 0 97
ASE_00254 0.15 0.16 0.14 13 36761 88 3 79 6 69
ASE_00255 0.11 0.12 0.10 16 74530 146 16 129 1 114
ASE_00257 0.37 0.42 0.33 41 50917 85 15 67 3 56
ASE_00267 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45036 115 9 105 1 88
ASE_00270 0.19 0.21 0.17 27 72232 132 14 117 1 101
ASE_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 55487 126 12 112 2 103
ASE_00277 0.10 0.12 0.08 11 48071 123 23 100 0 80
ASE_00279 0.14 0.16 0.13 16 53177 109 16 92 1 85
ASE_00285 0.34 0.36 0.31 44 68866 98 14 82 2 78
ASE_00287 0.15 0.17 0.14 17 54824 107 14 91 2 86
ASE_00294 0.12 0.13 0.12 23 114287 172 11 160 1 148
ASE_00298 0.09 0.10 0.08 11 67389 129 8 120 1 102
ASE_00318 0.03 0.04 0.03 5 80039 156 21 135 0 113
ASE_00335 0.10 0.12 0.09 14 75304 151 22 126 3 102
ASE_00340 0.06 0.07 0.05 6 45943 110 13 94 3 79
ASE_00367 0.08 0.09 0.07 8 42960 110 10 93 7 78
ASE_00370 0.03 0.04 0.03 3 41796 109 18 88 3 81
ASE_00372 0.17 0.20 0.15 20 51871 113 19 93 1 80
ASE_00376 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56822 136 9 122 5 105
ASE_00377 0.25 0.27 0.23 29 57505 98 10 86 2 78
ASE_00386 0.14 0.16 0.13 15 50284 106 9 95 2 81
ASE_00393 0.31 0.35 0.27 33 47773 90 18 71 1 60
ASE_00412 0.15 0.17 0.14 18 58183 111 14 96 1 87
ASE_00413 0.08 0.10 0.07 8 44438 108 19 86 3 73
ASE_00416 0.39 0.43 0.35 54 77267 103 18 82 3 73
ASE_00422 0.28 0.31 0.25 29 46856 87 9 77 1 65
ASE_00428 0.24 0.26 0.22 33 76483 121 13 107 1 92
ASE_00430 0.16 0.18 0.14 17 46852 102 10 92 0 80
ASE_00437 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 79238 164 12 151 1 135
ASE_00451 0.20 0.22 0.19 27 70731 118 8 110 0 98
TMR_00123 0.19 0.23 0.16 23 66283 126 20 104 2 78
TMR_00399 0.20 0.26 0.16 24 64833 130 38 85 7 70
TMR_00443 0.17 0.20 0.15 21 67018 126 24 98 4 83
TMR_00469 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 64469 145 27 112 6 88
TMR_00519 0.04 0.05 0.03 5 63046 141 33 106 2 90
TMR_00528 0.13 0.15 0.11 15 63051 131 20 104 7 82
TMR_00571 0.05 0.06 0.04 6 60577 149 19 124 6 93
TMR_00584 0.01 0.01 0.01 1 60922 159 33 119 7 96
TMR_00703 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 67376 140 26 114 0 87

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.