CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.633 > 0.160
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.032 > 0.157 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.577 > 0.182
Positive Predictive Value 0.696 > 0.142
Total TP 2645 > 837
Total TN 2596307 > 2594232
Total FP 1308 < 5150
Total FP CONTRA 151 < 686
Total FP INCONS 1004 < 4352
Total FP COMP 153 > 112
Total FN 1943 < 3751
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2645
Total TN 2596307
Total FP 1308
Total FP CONTRA 151
Total FP INCONS 1004
Total FP COMP 153
Total FN 1943
Total Scores
MCC 0.633
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.577
Positive Predictive Value 0.696
Nr of predictions 44

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.82 0.74 0.91 81 62392 10 0 8 2 29
ASE_00185 0.42 0.38 0.47 48 73434 58 2 52 4 80
ASE_00190 0.46 0.37 0.57 33 45393 28 4 21 3 57
ASE_00221 0.65 0.56 0.74 66 64531 24 0 23 1 51
ASE_00228 0.69 0.67 0.72 58 46890 26 4 19 3 28
ASE_00229 0.60 0.57 0.63 50 42406 32 4 26 2 37
ASE_00231 0.44 0.40 0.50 38 47819 42 3 35 4 58
ASE_00234 0.68 0.60 0.76 78 75363 27 6 19 2 51
ASE_00238 0.50 0.45 0.55 51 64169 42 6 35 1 63
ASE_00254 0.48 0.46 0.50 38 36780 39 5 33 1 44
ASE_00257 0.70 0.64 0.78 62 50960 25 1 17 7 35
ASE_00267 0.75 0.68 0.82 60 45077 21 1 12 8 28
ASE_00270 0.56 0.49 0.64 63 72292 38 2 33 3 65
ASE_00274 0.59 0.51 0.67 53 55532 28 5 21 2 50
ASE_00277 0.79 0.75 0.83 68 48123 16 0 14 2 23
ASE_00279 0.78 0.73 0.82 74 53211 20 2 14 4 27
ASE_00285 0.58 0.51 0.67 62 68914 32 3 27 2 60
ASE_00287 0.62 0.56 0.68 58 54861 28 0 27 1 45
ASE_00294 0.75 0.63 0.89 108 114359 16 1 13 2 63
ASE_00298 0.48 0.43 0.53 49 67435 46 2 42 2 64
ASE_00340 0.58 0.54 0.63 46 45983 31 8 19 4 39
ASE_00367 0.57 0.53 0.61 46 42995 36 1 29 6 40
ASE_00370 0.86 0.81 0.92 68 41831 14 0 6 8 16
ASE_00372 0.67 0.59 0.77 59 51926 19 1 17 1 41
ASE_00376 0.66 0.61 0.71 64 56863 28 1 25 2 41
ASE_00377 0.61 0.55 0.69 59 57544 29 3 24 2 48
ASE_00386 0.65 0.60 0.70 58 50320 27 5 20 2 38
ASE_00393 0.70 0.63 0.77 59 47818 20 1 17 2 34
ASE_00412 0.56 0.50 0.62 53 58226 34 3 29 2 52
ASE_00413 0.60 0.57 0.64 46 44479 27 2 24 1 35
ASE_00416 0.69 0.59 0.80 75 77327 28 1 18 9 52
ASE_00422 0.65 0.63 0.67 59 46883 30 4 25 1 35
ASE_00428 0.57 0.54 0.60 68 76522 47 4 42 1 57
ASE_00430 0.79 0.76 0.82 74 46881 16 2 14 0 23
ASE_00437 0.67 0.60 0.75 81 79293 27 1 26 0 54
ASE_00451 0.68 0.60 0.77 75 70779 24 1 21 2 50
TMR_00123 0.64 0.59 0.68 60 66342 34 4 24 6 41
TMR_00399 0.48 0.45 0.52 42 64899 46 9 30 7 52
TMR_00443 0.67 0.59 0.77 61 67082 22 4 14 4 43
TMR_00469 0.75 0.73 0.78 73 64526 30 7 14 9 27
TMR_00519 0.60 0.57 0.64 54 63106 34 12 18 4 41
TMR_00528 0.51 0.45 0.58 44 63114 37 10 22 5 53
TMR_00571 0.69 0.65 0.73 64 60638 34 10 14 10 35
TMR_00584 0.65 0.61 0.69 59 60989 36 6 21 9 38

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 837
Total TN 2594232
Total FP 5150
Total FP CONTRA 686
Total FP INCONS 4352
Total FP COMP 112
Total FN 3751
Total Scores
MCC 0.160
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.157 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.182
Positive Predictive Value 0.142
Nr of predictions 44

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.22 0.25 0.20 27 62347 108 12 95 1 83
ASE_00185 0.17 0.19 0.16 24 73382 134 14 116 4 104
ASE_00190 0.24 0.28 0.21 25 45334 93 14 78 1 65
ASE_00221 0.20 0.21 0.18 25 64484 112 10 101 1 92
ASE_00228 0.05 0.06 0.04 5 46858 109 17 91 1 81
ASE_00229 0.12 0.14 0.11 12 42380 97 12 82 3 75
ASE_00231 0.37 0.42 0.33 40 47773 84 17 65 2 56
ASE_00234 0.25 0.27 0.23 35 75315 117 10 106 1 94
ASE_00238 0.26 0.30 0.23 34 64111 119 18 98 3 80
ASE_00254 0.15 0.16 0.14 13 36761 88 3 79 6 69
ASE_00257 0.37 0.42 0.33 41 50917 85 15 67 3 56
ASE_00267 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45036 115 9 105 1 88
ASE_00270 0.19 0.21 0.17 27 72232 132 14 117 1 101
ASE_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 55487 126 12 112 2 103
ASE_00277 0.10 0.12 0.08 11 48071 123 23 100 0 80
ASE_00279 0.14 0.16 0.13 16 53177 109 16 92 1 85
ASE_00285 0.34 0.36 0.31 44 68866 98 14 82 2 78
ASE_00287 0.15 0.17 0.14 17 54824 107 14 91 2 86
ASE_00294 0.12 0.13 0.12 23 114287 172 11 160 1 148
ASE_00298 0.09 0.10 0.08 11 67389 129 8 120 1 102
ASE_00340 0.06 0.07 0.05 6 45943 110 13 94 3 79
ASE_00367 0.08 0.09 0.07 8 42960 110 10 93 7 78
ASE_00370 0.03 0.04 0.03 3 41796 109 18 88 3 81
ASE_00372 0.17 0.20 0.15 20 51871 113 19 93 1 80
ASE_00376 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56822 136 9 122 5 105
ASE_00377 0.25 0.27 0.23 29 57505 98 10 86 2 78
ASE_00386 0.14 0.16 0.13 15 50284 106 9 95 2 81
ASE_00393 0.31 0.35 0.27 33 47773 90 18 71 1 60
ASE_00412 0.15 0.17 0.14 18 58183 111 14 96 1 87
ASE_00413 0.08 0.10 0.07 8 44438 108 19 86 3 73
ASE_00416 0.39 0.43 0.35 54 77267 103 18 82 3 73
ASE_00422 0.28 0.31 0.25 29 46856 87 9 77 1 65
ASE_00428 0.24 0.26 0.22 33 76483 121 13 107 1 92
ASE_00430 0.16 0.18 0.14 17 46852 102 10 92 0 80
ASE_00437 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 79238 164 12 151 1 135
ASE_00451 0.20 0.22 0.19 27 70731 118 8 110 0 98
TMR_00123 0.19 0.23 0.16 23 66283 126 20 104 2 78
TMR_00399 0.20 0.26 0.16 24 64833 130 38 85 7 70
TMR_00443 0.17 0.20 0.15 21 67018 126 24 98 4 83
TMR_00469 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 64469 145 27 112 6 88
TMR_00519 0.04 0.05 0.03 5 63046 141 33 106 2 90
TMR_00528 0.13 0.15 0.11 15 63051 131 20 104 7 82
TMR_00571 0.05 0.06 0.04 6 60577 149 19 124 6 93
TMR_00584 0.01 0.01 0.01 1 60922 159 33 119 7 96

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.