CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.602 > 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.599 ± 0.036 > 0.541 ± 0.034
Sensitivity 0.551 > 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.660 < 0.697
Total TP 2275 > 1766
Total TN 2695381 < 2696296
Total FP 1453 > 960
Total FP CONTRA 286 > 227
Total FP INCONS 886 > 539
Total FP COMP 281 > 194
Total FN 1856 < 2365
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2275
Total TN 2695381
Total FP 1453
Total FP CONTRA 286
Total FP INCONS 886
Total FP COMP 281
Total FN 1856
Total Scores
MCC 0.602
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.599 ± 0.036
Sensitivity 0.551
Positive Predictive Value 0.660
Nr of predictions 42

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.76 0.67 0.86 60 45381 21 0 10 11 29
ASE_00090 0.52 0.46 0.60 46 55534 36 5 26 5 55
ASE_00135 0.54 0.49 0.60 53 63102 40 6 29 5 56
ASE_00153 0.38 0.37 0.39 27 57560 76 9 34 33 46
ASE_00215 0.18 0.15 0.23 15 48450 55 4 47 4 84
ASE_00328 0.76 0.67 0.87 75 72685 23 1 10 12 37
ASE_00361 0.58 0.49 0.69 62 75376 29 3 25 1 65
ASE_00441 0.66 0.57 0.77 64 64178 19 2 17 0 48
TMR_00017 0.59 0.56 0.62 57 67069 39 8 27 4 45
TMR_00018 0.59 0.54 0.65 50 64543 31 7 20 4 42
TMR_00042 0.61 0.57 0.65 56 62749 34 7 23 4 42
TMR_00046 0.65 0.63 0.67 60 62746 35 9 20 6 36
TMR_00048 0.59 0.55 0.63 52 64898 38 6 24 8 43
TMR_00080 0.51 0.46 0.56 44 70422 34 10 24 0 52
TMR_00082 0.65 0.59 0.71 57 67816 30 7 16 7 39
TMR_00123 0.64 0.59 0.68 60 66342 34 4 24 6 41
TMR_00137 0.33 0.28 0.38 25 61009 44 9 32 3 64
TMR_00142 0.62 0.64 0.61 65 70769 49 12 30 7 37
TMR_00207 0.40 0.35 0.45 36 72310 49 6 38 5 67
TMR_00257 0.68 0.61 0.76 60 67082 27 4 15 8 38
TMR_00271 0.64 0.56 0.74 51 64192 20 6 12 2 40
TMR_00366 0.64 0.60 0.67 60 67807 40 12 17 11 40
TMR_00378 0.67 0.63 0.71 61 67810 38 5 20 13 36
TMR_00404 0.59 0.59 0.60 54 67438 49 12 24 13 38
TMR_00427 0.53 0.41 0.69 40 67470 22 7 11 4 57
TMR_00443 0.67 0.59 0.77 61 67082 22 4 14 4 43
TMR_00451 0.52 0.45 0.60 40 63479 31 7 20 4 49
TMR_00458 0.70 0.63 0.77 59 63469 21 4 14 3 34
TMR_00469 0.75 0.73 0.78 73 64526 30 7 14 9 27
TMR_00472 0.76 0.73 0.80 71 64531 23 7 11 5 26
TMR_00519 0.60 0.57 0.64 54 63106 34 12 18 4 41
TMR_00520 0.67 0.62 0.73 61 63106 31 4 19 8 38
TMR_00522 0.53 0.47 0.60 46 63113 36 9 22 5 51
TMR_00528 0.51 0.45 0.58 44 63114 37 10 22 5 53
TMR_00568 0.62 0.59 0.65 58 60637 40 8 23 9 41
TMR_00571 0.69 0.65 0.73 64 60638 34 10 14 10 35
TMR_00580 0.62 0.61 0.63 61 60629 46 10 26 10 39
TMR_00584 0.65 0.61 0.69 59 60989 36 6 21 9 38
TMR_00586 0.60 0.59 0.61 57 60982 43 11 25 7 40
TMR_00616 0.65 0.63 0.68 62 67070 35 7 22 6 37
TMR_00699 0.69 0.60 0.80 61 67085 16 2 13 1 41
TMR_00702 0.63 0.54 0.73 54 67087 26 7 13 6 46

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1766
Total TN 2696296
Total FP 960
Total FP CONTRA 227
Total FP INCONS 539
Total FP COMP 194
Total FN 2365
Total Scores
MCC 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.034
Sensitivity 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.697
Nr of predictions 42

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.