CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.251 > 0.000
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.269 ± 0.152 > 0.000 ± 0.000
Sensitivity 0.296 > 0.000
Positive Predictive Value 0.215 > 0.000
Total TP 190 > 0
Total TN 397546 < 398430
Total FP 715 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 140 > 0
Total FP INCONS 554 > 0
Total FP COMP 21 > 0
Total FN 452 < 642
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 190
Total TN 397546
Total FP 715
Total FP CONTRA 140
Total FP INCONS 554
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 452
Total Scores
MCC 0.251
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.269 ± 0.152
Sensitivity 0.296
Positive Predictive Value 0.215
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00196 0.49 0.57 0.42 43 31524 62 16 43 3 32
ASE_00417 0.32 0.36 0.28 36 54486 98 18 75 5 64
CRW_00671 0.18 0.21 0.16 24 62682 130 23 106 1 93
CRW_00672 0.36 0.43 0.31 48 72233 114 35 74 5 63
CRW_00674 0.16 0.19 0.14 23 83274 142 19 120 3 101
CRW_00676 0.11 0.14 0.09 16 93347 169 29 136 4 99

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 0
Total TN 398430
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 642
Total Scores
MCC 0.000
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.000 ± 0.000
Sensitivity 0.000
Positive Predictive Value 0.000
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00196 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31626 0 0 0 0 75
ASE_00417 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54615 0 0 0 0 100
CRW_00671 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 62835 0 0 0 0 117
CRW_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 72390 0 0 0 0 111
CRW_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 83436 0 0 0 0 124
CRW_00676 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 93528 0 0 0 0 115

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.