CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.179 > 0.000
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.178 ± 0.030 > 0.000 ± 0.000
Sensitivity 0.205 > 0.000
Positive Predictive Value 0.159 > 0.000
Total TP 1201 > 0
Total TN 3420242 < 3427798
Total FP 6544 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 913 > 0
Total FP INCONS 5442 > 0
Total FP COMP 189 > 0
Total FN 4668 < 5869
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1201
Total TN 3420242
Total FP 6544
Total FP CONTRA 913
Total FP INCONS 5442
Total FP COMP 189
Total FN 4668
Total Scores
MCC 0.179
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.178 ± 0.030
Sensitivity 0.205
Positive Predictive Value 0.159
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00017 0.02 0.03 0.02 2 50914 131 38 86 7 62
ASE_00185 0.17 0.19 0.16 24 73382 134 14 116 4 104
ASE_00190 0.24 0.28 0.21 25 45334 93 14 78 1 65
ASE_00196 0.49 0.57 0.42 43 31524 62 16 43 3 32
ASE_00221 0.20 0.21 0.18 25 64484 112 10 101 1 92
ASE_00227 0.28 0.31 0.25 41 78840 122 20 102 0 92
ASE_00228 0.05 0.06 0.04 5 46858 109 17 91 1 81
ASE_00229 0.12 0.14 0.11 12 42380 97 12 82 3 75
ASE_00231 0.37 0.42 0.33 40 47773 84 17 65 2 56
ASE_00234 0.25 0.27 0.23 35 75315 117 10 106 1 94
ASE_00238 0.26 0.30 0.23 34 64111 119 18 98 3 80
ASE_00248 0.13 0.15 0.12 17 62340 124 9 115 0 97
ASE_00250 0.25 0.29 0.23 38 78835 135 17 113 5 93
ASE_00254 0.15 0.16 0.14 13 36761 88 3 79 6 69
ASE_00255 0.11 0.12 0.10 16 74530 146 16 129 1 114
ASE_00257 0.37 0.42 0.33 41 50917 85 15 67 3 56
ASE_00267 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45036 115 9 105 1 88
ASE_00270 0.19 0.21 0.17 27 72232 132 14 117 1 101
ASE_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 55487 126 12 112 2 103
ASE_00277 0.10 0.12 0.08 11 48071 123 23 100 0 80
ASE_00279 0.14 0.16 0.13 16 53177 109 16 92 1 85
ASE_00285 0.34 0.36 0.31 44 68866 98 14 82 2 78
ASE_00287 0.15 0.17 0.14 17 54824 107 14 91 2 86
ASE_00294 0.12 0.13 0.12 23 114287 172 11 160 1 148
ASE_00295 0.14 0.16 0.13 21 73761 140 19 119 2 110
ASE_00298 0.09 0.10 0.08 11 67389 129 8 120 1 102
ASE_00318 0.03 0.04 0.03 5 80039 156 21 135 0 113
ASE_00335 0.10 0.12 0.09 14 75304 151 22 126 3 102
ASE_00339 0.25 0.29 0.22 34 80042 129 20 104 5 85
ASE_00340 0.06 0.07 0.05 6 45943 110 13 94 3 79
ASE_00343 0.14 0.17 0.12 19 83275 145 31 111 3 94
ASE_00367 0.08 0.09 0.07 8 42960 110 10 93 7 78
ASE_00370 0.03 0.04 0.03 3 41796 109 18 88 3 81
ASE_00372 0.17 0.20 0.15 20 51871 113 19 93 1 80
ASE_00375 0.12 0.14 0.11 15 60246 120 10 107 3 95
ASE_00376 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56822 136 9 122 5 105
ASE_00377 0.25 0.27 0.23 29 57505 98 10 86 2 78
ASE_00386 0.14 0.16 0.13 15 50284 106 9 95 2 81
ASE_00393 0.31 0.35 0.27 33 47773 90 18 71 1 60
ASE_00412 0.15 0.17 0.14 18 58183 111 14 96 1 87
ASE_00413 0.08 0.10 0.07 8 44438 108 19 86 3 73
ASE_00416 0.39 0.43 0.35 54 77267 103 18 82 3 73
ASE_00417 0.32 0.36 0.28 36 54486 98 18 75 5 64
ASE_00422 0.28 0.31 0.25 29 46856 87 9 77 1 65
ASE_00428 0.24 0.26 0.22 33 76483 121 13 107 1 92
ASE_00430 0.16 0.18 0.14 17 46852 102 10 92 0 80
ASE_00434 0.29 0.34 0.25 37 68116 122 20 92 10 73
ASE_00437 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 79238 164 12 151 1 135
ASE_00451 0.20 0.22 0.19 27 70731 118 8 110 0 98
CRW_00671 0.18 0.21 0.16 24 62682 130 23 106 1 93
CRW_00672 0.36 0.43 0.31 48 72233 114 35 74 5 63
CRW_00674 0.16 0.19 0.14 23 83274 142 19 120 3 101
CRW_00676 0.11 0.14 0.09 16 93347 169 29 136 4 99
TMR_00357 0.26 0.34 0.19 31 82869 146 44 84 18 61
TMR_00431 0.24 0.33 0.17 18 51899 127 26 60 41 37

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 0
Total TN 3427798
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 5869
Total Scores
MCC 0.000
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.000 ± 0.000
Sensitivity 0.000
Positive Predictive Value 0.000
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 51040 0 0 0 0 64
ASE_00185 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 73536 0 0 0 0 128
ASE_00190 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45451 0 0 0 0 90
ASE_00196 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31626 0 0 0 0 75
ASE_00221 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 64620 0 0 0 0 117
ASE_00227 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 79003 0 0 0 0 133
ASE_00228 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46971 0 0 0 0 86
ASE_00229 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 42486 0 0 0 0 87
ASE_00231 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 47895 0 0 0 0 96
ASE_00234 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 75466 0 0 0 0 129
ASE_00238 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 64261 0 0 0 0 114
ASE_00248 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 62481 0 0 0 0 114
ASE_00250 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 79003 0 0 0 0 131
ASE_00254 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 36856 0 0 0 0 82
ASE_00255 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 74691 0 0 0 0 130
ASE_00257 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 51040 0 0 0 0 97
ASE_00267 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45150 0 0 0 0 88
ASE_00270 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 72390 0 0 0 0 128
ASE_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 55611 0 0 0 0 103
ASE_00277 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 48205 0 0 0 0 91
ASE_00279 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 53301 0 0 0 0 101
ASE_00285 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 69006 0 0 0 0 122
ASE_00287 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54946 0 0 0 0 103
ASE_00294 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 114481 0 0 0 0 171
ASE_00295 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 73920 0 0 0 0 131
ASE_00298 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 67528 0 0 0 0 113
ASE_00318 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 80200 0 0 0 0 118
ASE_00335 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 75466 0 0 0 0 116
ASE_00339 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 80200 0 0 0 0 119
ASE_00340 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 85
ASE_00343 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 83436 0 0 0 0 113
ASE_00367 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 43071 0 0 0 0 86
ASE_00370 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 41905 0 0 0 0 84
ASE_00372 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 52003 0 0 0 0 100
ASE_00375 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 60378 0 0 0 0 110
ASE_00376 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56953 0 0 0 0 105
ASE_00377 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 57630 0 0 0 0 107
ASE_00386 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 50403 0 0 0 0 96
ASE_00393 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 47895 0 0 0 0 93
ASE_00412 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 58311 0 0 0 0 105
ASE_00413 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 44551 0 0 0 0 81
ASE_00416 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 77421 0 0 0 0 127
ASE_00417 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54615 0 0 0 0 100
ASE_00422 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46971 0 0 0 0 94
ASE_00428 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 76636 0 0 0 0 125
ASE_00430 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46971 0 0 0 0 97
ASE_00434 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 68265 0 0 0 0 110
ASE_00437 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 79401 0 0 0 0 135
ASE_00451 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70876 0 0 0 0 125
CRW_00671 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 62835 0 0 0 0 117
CRW_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 72390 0 0 0 0 111
CRW_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 83436 0 0 0 0 124
CRW_00676 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 93528 0 0 0 0 115
TMR_00357 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 83028 0 0 0 0 92
TMR_00431 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 52003 0 0 0 0 55

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.