CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.733 > 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.737 ± 0.024 > 0.151 ± 0.029
Sensitivity 0.649 > 0.174
Positive Predictive Value 0.829 > 0.135
Total TP 3352 > 901
Total TN 2956430 > 2953821
Total FP 958 < 5867
Total FP CONTRA 176 < 780
Total FP INCONS 515 < 4971
Total FP COMP 267 > 116
Total FN 1813 < 4264
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3352
Total TN 2956430
Total FP 958
Total FP CONTRA 176
Total FP INCONS 515
Total FP COMP 267
Total FN 1813
Total Scores
MCC 0.733
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.737 ± 0.024
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.829
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.76 0.65 0.90 71 62402 11 4 4 3 39
ASE_00185 0.69 0.53 0.91 68 73461 12 3 4 5 60
ASE_00190 0.73 0.64 0.82 58 45380 21 3 10 8 32
ASE_00221 0.85 0.79 0.90 93 64517 14 4 6 4 24
ASE_00228 0.75 0.69 0.83 59 46900 16 2 10 4 27
ASE_00229 0.88 0.80 0.96 70 42413 7 2 1 4 17
ASE_00231 0.67 0.57 0.77 55 47824 22 0 16 6 41
ASE_00234 0.64 0.52 0.79 67 75381 22 8 10 4 62
ASE_00238 0.65 0.55 0.77 63 64179 25 5 14 6 51
ASE_00248 0.84 0.81 0.88 92 62376 18 4 9 5 22
ASE_00254 0.90 0.82 0.99 67 36788 6 1 0 5 15
ASE_00255 0.60 0.55 0.67 71 74585 35 5 30 0 59
ASE_00257 0.73 0.66 0.80 64 50960 21 5 11 5 33
ASE_00267 0.83 0.78 0.88 69 45072 15 4 5 6 19
ASE_00270 0.58 0.44 0.77 56 72317 21 2 15 4 72
ASE_00274 0.68 0.60 0.78 62 55531 22 5 13 4 41
ASE_00277 0.73 0.67 0.79 61 48128 20 6 10 4 30
ASE_00279 0.79 0.69 0.90 70 53223 13 2 6 5 31
ASE_00285 0.73 0.59 0.90 72 68926 12 2 6 4 50
ASE_00287 0.70 0.62 0.78 64 54864 24 4 14 6 39
ASE_00294 0.72 0.58 0.90 99 114371 15 4 7 4 72
ASE_00298 0.72 0.61 0.85 69 67447 15 3 9 3 44
ASE_00318 0.76 0.69 0.84 81 80103 23 3 13 7 37
ASE_00335 0.77 0.72 0.83 83 75366 28 3 14 11 33
ASE_00340 0.79 0.72 0.87 61 45986 16 3 6 7 24
ASE_00367 0.85 0.80 0.91 69 42995 12 2 5 5 17
ASE_00370 0.87 0.83 0.91 70 41828 12 2 5 5 14
ASE_00372 0.79 0.69 0.90 69 51926 14 1 7 6 31
ASE_00376 0.73 0.64 0.84 67 56873 18 3 10 5 38
ASE_00377 0.76 0.65 0.88 70 57550 13 3 7 3 37
ASE_00386 0.80 0.72 0.88 69 50325 12 2 7 3 27
ASE_00393 0.71 0.67 0.77 62 47814 24 3 16 5 31
ASE_00412 0.61 0.54 0.70 57 58229 28 5 20 3 48
ASE_00413 0.77 0.77 0.78 62 44472 24 6 11 7 19
ASE_00416 0.74 0.67 0.81 85 77316 25 4 16 5 42
ASE_00422 0.82 0.73 0.92 69 46896 12 0 6 6 25
ASE_00428 0.76 0.70 0.81 88 76528 24 6 14 4 37
ASE_00430 0.79 0.69 0.91 67 46897 12 1 6 5 30
ASE_00437 0.58 0.50 0.67 68 79300 36 3 30 3 67
ASE_00451 0.80 0.74 0.88 92 70771 17 4 9 4 33
TMR_00123 0.68 0.54 0.85 55 66365 18 3 7 8 46
TMR_00399 0.66 0.62 0.71 58 64898 36 6 18 12 36
TMR_00443 0.81 0.71 0.93 74 67081 13 2 4 7 30
TMR_00469 0.73 0.64 0.84 64 64544 18 7 5 6 36
TMR_00519 0.63 0.56 0.72 53 63116 33 8 13 12 42
TMR_00528 0.50 0.45 0.56 44 63111 40 12 23 5 53
TMR_00571 0.74 0.69 0.79 68 60640 27 2 16 9 31
TMR_00584 0.78 0.70 0.87 68 60997 19 2 8 9 29
TMR_00703 0.71 0.60 0.84 59 67458 17 2 9 6 40

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 901
Total TN 2953821
Total FP 5867
Total FP CONTRA 780
Total FP INCONS 4971
Total FP COMP 116
Total FN 4264
Total Scores
MCC 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.151 ± 0.029
Sensitivity 0.174
Positive Predictive Value 0.135
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.22 0.25 0.20 27 62347 108 12 95 1 83
ASE_00185 0.17 0.19 0.16 24 73382 134 14 116 4 104
ASE_00190 0.24 0.28 0.21 25 45334 93 14 78 1 65
ASE_00221 0.20 0.21 0.18 25 64484 112 10 101 1 92
ASE_00228 0.05 0.06 0.04 5 46858 109 17 91 1 81
ASE_00229 0.12 0.14 0.11 12 42380 97 12 82 3 75
ASE_00231 0.37 0.42 0.33 40 47773 84 17 65 2 56
ASE_00234 0.25 0.27 0.23 35 75315 117 10 106 1 94
ASE_00238 0.26 0.30 0.23 34 64111 119 18 98 3 80
ASE_00248 0.13 0.15 0.12 17 62340 124 9 115 0 97
ASE_00254 0.15 0.16 0.14 13 36761 88 3 79 6 69
ASE_00255 0.11 0.12 0.10 16 74530 146 16 129 1 114
ASE_00257 0.37 0.42 0.33 41 50917 85 15 67 3 56
ASE_00267 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45036 115 9 105 1 88
ASE_00270 0.19 0.21 0.17 27 72232 132 14 117 1 101
ASE_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 55487 126 12 112 2 103
ASE_00277 0.10 0.12 0.08 11 48071 123 23 100 0 80
ASE_00279 0.14 0.16 0.13 16 53177 109 16 92 1 85
ASE_00285 0.34 0.36 0.31 44 68866 98 14 82 2 78
ASE_00287 0.15 0.17 0.14 17 54824 107 14 91 2 86
ASE_00294 0.12 0.13 0.12 23 114287 172 11 160 1 148
ASE_00298 0.09 0.10 0.08 11 67389 129 8 120 1 102
ASE_00318 0.03 0.04 0.03 5 80039 156 21 135 0 113
ASE_00335 0.10 0.12 0.09 14 75304 151 22 126 3 102
ASE_00340 0.06 0.07 0.05 6 45943 110 13 94 3 79
ASE_00367 0.08 0.09 0.07 8 42960 110 10 93 7 78
ASE_00370 0.03 0.04 0.03 3 41796 109 18 88 3 81
ASE_00372 0.17 0.20 0.15 20 51871 113 19 93 1 80
ASE_00376 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56822 136 9 122 5 105
ASE_00377 0.25 0.27 0.23 29 57505 98 10 86 2 78
ASE_00386 0.14 0.16 0.13 15 50284 106 9 95 2 81
ASE_00393 0.31 0.35 0.27 33 47773 90 18 71 1 60
ASE_00412 0.15 0.17 0.14 18 58183 111 14 96 1 87
ASE_00413 0.08 0.10 0.07 8 44438 108 19 86 3 73
ASE_00416 0.39 0.43 0.35 54 77267 103 18 82 3 73
ASE_00422 0.28 0.31 0.25 29 46856 87 9 77 1 65
ASE_00428 0.24 0.26 0.22 33 76483 121 13 107 1 92
ASE_00430 0.16 0.18 0.14 17 46852 102 10 92 0 80
ASE_00437 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 79238 164 12 151 1 135
ASE_00451 0.20 0.22 0.19 27 70731 118 8 110 0 98
TMR_00123 0.19 0.23 0.16 23 66283 126 20 104 2 78
TMR_00399 0.20 0.26 0.16 24 64833 130 38 85 7 70
TMR_00443 0.17 0.20 0.15 21 67018 126 24 98 4 83
TMR_00469 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 64469 145 27 112 6 88
TMR_00519 0.04 0.05 0.03 5 63046 141 33 106 2 90
TMR_00528 0.13 0.15 0.11 15 63051 131 20 104 7 82
TMR_00571 0.05 0.06 0.04 6 60577 149 19 124 6 93
TMR_00584 0.01 0.01 0.01 1 60922 159 33 119 7 96
TMR_00703 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 67376 140 26 114 0 87

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.