CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.676 > 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.022 > 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.587 > 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.779 > 0.695
Total TP 2602 > 1886
Total TN 2903713 < 2904341
Total FP 1100 > 1026
Total FP CONTRA 265 > 246
Total FP INCONS 473 < 580
Total FP COMP 362 > 200
Total FN 1831 < 2547
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2602
Total TN 2903713
Total FP 1100
Total FP CONTRA 265
Total FP INCONS 473
Total FP COMP 362
Total FN 1831
Total Scores
MCC 0.676
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.022
Sensitivity 0.587
Positive Predictive Value 0.779
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.83 0.79 0.88 70 45371 15 4 6 5 19
ASE_00090 0.80 0.72 0.89 73 55529 15 4 5 6 28
ASE_00135 0.63 0.55 0.71 60 63106 27 6 18 3 49
ASE_00153 0.63 0.55 0.71 40 57574 20 3 13 4 33
ASE_00215 0.60 0.49 0.72 49 48448 21 4 15 2 50
ASE_00328 0.87 0.83 0.90 93 72668 24 2 8 14 19
ASE_00361 0.71 0.57 0.88 72 75384 15 4 6 5 55
ASE_00441 0.69 0.57 0.84 64 64185 18 4 8 6 48
TMR_00017 0.72 0.62 0.84 63 67086 20 6 6 8 39
TMR_00018 0.65 0.59 0.72 54 64545 29 8 13 8 38
TMR_00042 0.68 0.60 0.78 59 62759 23 7 10 6 39
TMR_00046 0.47 0.42 0.53 40 62760 41 6 29 6 56
TMR_00048 0.68 0.61 0.76 58 64904 24 7 11 6 37
TMR_00080 0.55 0.49 0.63 47 70425 35 10 18 7 49
TMR_00082 0.59 0.51 0.68 49 67824 32 9 14 9 47
TMR_00123 0.72 0.61 0.84 62 66356 21 7 5 9 39
TMR_00137 0.63 0.56 0.71 50 61005 32 8 12 12 39
TMR_00142 0.63 0.54 0.74 55 70802 27 4 15 8 47
TMR_00207 0.68 0.57 0.80 59 72316 24 7 8 9 44
TMR_00257 0.72 0.62 0.82 61 67087 22 7 6 9 37
TMR_00271 0.62 0.54 0.71 49 64192 32 7 13 12 42
TMR_00332 0.69 0.60 0.80 59 67087 25 6 9 10 40
TMR_00366 0.63 0.54 0.74 54 67823 28 3 16 9 46
TMR_00378 0.65 0.55 0.77 53 67827 26 3 13 10 44
TMR_00404 0.58 0.51 0.66 47 67457 35 6 18 11 45
TMR_00427 0.68 0.60 0.76 58 67452 26 11 7 8 39
TMR_00443 0.72 0.62 0.84 64 67085 19 6 6 7 40
TMR_00451 0.56 0.51 0.63 45 63474 37 13 14 10 44
TMR_00458 0.66 0.58 0.75 54 63474 29 8 10 11 39
TMR_00469 0.71 0.61 0.84 61 64547 20 6 6 8 39
TMR_00472 0.68 0.59 0.79 57 64548 23 7 8 8 40
TMR_00519 0.64 0.57 0.72 54 63115 29 9 12 8 41
TMR_00520 0.68 0.60 0.79 59 63115 25 7 9 9 40
TMR_00522 0.65 0.56 0.75 54 63118 28 6 12 10 43
TMR_00528 0.64 0.56 0.74 54 63117 28 6 13 9 43
TMR_00540 0.65 0.56 0.75 58 73459 25 9 10 6 46
TMR_00568 0.76 0.65 0.89 64 60654 17 1 7 9 35
TMR_00571 0.78 0.67 0.92 66 60654 16 1 5 10 33
TMR_00580 0.74 0.61 0.90 61 60658 17 2 5 10 39
TMR_00584 0.77 0.65 0.91 63 61006 14 2 4 8 34
TMR_00586 0.74 0.64 0.85 62 61002 19 5 6 8 35
TMR_00616 0.65 0.56 0.75 55 67088 24 8 10 6 44
TMR_00699 0.68 0.58 0.80 59 67087 23 6 9 8 43
TMR_00702 0.64 0.55 0.74 55 67087 27 3 16 8 45
TMR_00703 0.68 0.60 0.79 59 67453 23 7 9 7 40

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.