CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.656 > 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.652 ± 0.028 > 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.541 > 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.795 > 0.695
Total TP 2400 > 1886
Total TN 2904034 < 2904341
Total FP 811 < 1026
Total FP CONTRA 204 < 246
Total FP INCONS 415 < 580
Total FP COMP 192 < 200
Total FN 2033 < 2547
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2400
Total TN 2904034
Total FP 811
Total FP CONTRA 204
Total FP INCONS 415
Total FP COMP 192
Total FN 2033
Total Scores
MCC 0.656
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.652 ± 0.028
Sensitivity 0.541
Positive Predictive Value 0.795
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.80 0.73 0.87 65 45376 15 1 9 5 24
ASE_00090 0.78 0.67 0.91 68 55536 11 2 5 4 33
ASE_00135 0.63 0.54 0.74 59 63110 24 3 18 3 50
ASE_00153 0.43 0.37 0.50 27 57576 32 4 23 5 46
ASE_00215 0.62 0.46 0.82 46 48460 13 2 8 3 53
ASE_00328 0.81 0.75 0.88 84 72675 19 1 11 7 28
ASE_00361 0.69 0.53 0.89 67 75391 13 3 5 5 60
ASE_00441 0.70 0.57 0.86 64 64187 13 3 7 3 48
TMR_00017 0.71 0.55 0.92 56 67100 8 1 4 3 46
TMR_00018 0.63 0.52 0.76 48 64557 21 6 9 6 44
TMR_00042 0.62 0.49 0.79 48 62774 13 4 9 0 50
TMR_00046 0.46 0.36 0.58 35 62775 26 4 21 1 61
TMR_00048 0.63 0.52 0.77 49 64916 16 7 8 1 46
TMR_00080 0.64 0.51 0.80 49 70439 13 7 5 1 47
TMR_00082 0.57 0.45 0.73 43 67837 20 6 10 4 53
TMR_00123 0.68 0.52 0.88 53 66370 12 1 6 5 48
TMR_00137 0.69 0.60 0.79 53 61008 20 7 7 6 36
TMR_00142 0.50 0.40 0.61 41 70809 31 10 16 5 61
TMR_00207 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 72333 18 1 10 7 57
TMR_00257 0.71 0.58 0.88 57 67096 13 3 5 5 41
TMR_00271 0.59 0.48 0.72 44 64200 19 6 11 2 47
TMR_00332 0.70 0.56 0.89 55 67099 12 2 5 5 44
TMR_00366 0.48 0.41 0.57 41 67824 35 9 22 4 59
TMR_00378 0.50 0.41 0.62 40 67831 34 8 17 9 57
TMR_00404 0.54 0.45 0.66 41 67466 22 8 13 1 51
TMR_00427 0.56 0.43 0.74 42 67471 15 9 6 0 55
TMR_00443 0.76 0.63 0.93 65 67091 11 2 3 6 39
TMR_00451 0.57 0.51 0.65 45 63477 32 11 13 8 44
TMR_00458 0.67 0.57 0.78 53 63478 19 7 8 4 40
TMR_00469 0.73 0.61 0.88 61 64551 11 4 4 3 39
TMR_00472 0.67 0.58 0.79 56 64549 19 9 6 4 41
TMR_00519 0.63 0.54 0.74 51 63121 25 7 11 7 44
TMR_00520 0.65 0.55 0.78 54 63121 18 1 14 3 45
TMR_00522 0.62 0.51 0.77 49 63126 19 6 9 4 48
TMR_00528 0.62 0.51 0.75 49 63125 20 5 11 4 48
TMR_00540 0.69 0.58 0.83 60 73464 14 7 5 2 44
TMR_00568 0.75 0.66 0.87 65 60651 16 2 8 6 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.68 0.88 67 60650 15 2 7 6 32
TMR_00580 0.76 0.65 0.88 65 60652 15 2 7 6 35
TMR_00584 0.78 0.66 0.93 64 61006 13 2 3 8 33
TMR_00586 0.72 0.63 0.82 61 61001 19 5 8 6 36
TMR_00616 0.68 0.57 0.81 56 67092 17 7 6 4 43
TMR_00699 0.69 0.54 0.87 55 67098 9 1 7 1 47
TMR_00702 0.60 0.45 0.79 45 67104 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00703 0.71 0.59 0.87 58 67461 14 3 6 5 41

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.