CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.450 > 0.356
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.446 ± 0.126 > 0.364 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.424 > 0.168
Positive Predictive Value 0.480 < 0.757
Total TP 449 > 178
Total TN 633240 < 633940
Total FP 539 > 57
Total FP CONTRA 73 > 2
Total FP INCONS 413 > 55
Total FP COMP 53 > 0
Total FN 610 < 881
P-value 1.22797000563e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 449
Total TN 633240
Total FP 539
Total FP CONTRA 73
Total FP INCONS 413
Total FP COMP 53
Total FN 610
Total Scores
MCC 0.450
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.446 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.424
Positive Predictive Value 0.480
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.48 0.45 0.52 54 77317 58 5 45 8 66
CRW_00610 0.06 0.06 0.07 5 36246 64 9 55 0 76
CRW_00613 0.59 0.50 0.70 39 34924 24 1 16 7 39
CRW_00618 0.21 0.21 0.21 13 56218 62 6 43 13 48
CRW_00633 0.50 0.49 0.51 52 63444 52 5 45 2 54
CRW_00634 0.50 0.50 0.51 47 64527 48 11 35 2 47
CRW_00670 0.45 0.43 0.47 52 70015 58 8 50 0 68
CRW_00671 0.60 0.53 0.68 62 62744 32 2 27 3 55
CRW_00672 0.43 0.41 0.45 45 72291 57 6 48 3 66
CRW_00692 0.33 0.34 0.33 31 68540 77 20 44 13 59
PDB_00827 0.74 0.60 0.91 49 26974 7 0 5 2 32

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 178
Total TN 633940
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 55
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 881
Total Scores
MCC 0.356
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.364 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.168
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.