CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & CMfinder(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) CMfinder(20)
MCC 0.543 > 0.370
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.365 ± 0.033
Sensitivity 0.425 > 0.220
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.625
Total TP 1886 > 976
Total TN 2904341 < 2905492
Total FP 1026 > 774
Total FP CONTRA 246 > 85
Total FP INCONS 580 > 500
Total FP COMP 200 > 189
Total FN 2547 < 3457
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and CMfinder(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and CMfinder(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CMfinder(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 976
Total TN 2905492
Total FP 774
Total FP CONTRA 85
Total FP INCONS 500
Total FP COMP 189
Total FN 3457
Total Scores
MCC 0.370
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.365 ± 0.033
Sensitivity 0.220
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.48 0.30 0.75 27 45415 10 1 8 1 62
ASE_00090 0.46 0.33 0.66 33 55561 18 0 17 1 68
ASE_00135 0.47 0.34 0.65 37 63133 20 1 19 0 72
ASE_00153 0.09 0.05 0.16 4 57605 39 5 16 18 69
ASE_00215 0.42 0.27 0.66 27 48475 15 0 14 1 72
ASE_00328 0.48 0.34 0.69 38 72716 20 4 13 3 74
ASE_00361 0.40 0.21 0.75 27 75430 10 1 8 1 100
ASE_00441 0.53 0.36 0.80 40 64211 11 1 9 1 72
TMR_00017 0.44 0.23 0.85 23 67134 8 0 4 4 79
TMR_00018 0.29 0.13 0.67 12 64602 10 0 6 4 80
TMR_00042 0.22 0.12 0.40 12 62805 21 0 18 3 86
TMR_00046 0.31 0.22 0.44 21 62787 30 4 23 3 75
TMR_00048 0.28 0.20 0.40 19 64933 33 5 23 5 76
TMR_00080 0.47 0.29 0.76 28 70463 9 0 9 0 68
TMR_00082 0.44 0.30 0.63 29 67850 21 1 16 4 67
TMR_00123 0.41 0.22 0.76 22 66401 12 0 7 5 79
TMR_00137 0.33 0.20 0.55 18 61042 21 2 13 6 71
TMR_00142 0.12 0.07 0.21 7 70843 33 8 18 7 95
TMR_00207 0.32 0.18 0.54 19 72355 16 6 10 0 84
TMR_00257 0.46 0.29 0.76 28 67124 14 0 9 5 70
TMR_00271 0.28 0.14 0.57 13 64238 15 1 9 5 78
TMR_00332 0.40 0.22 0.71 22 67130 14 0 9 5 77
TMR_00366 0.32 0.17 0.59 17 67867 23 3 9 11 83
TMR_00378 0.32 0.18 0.59 17 67867 23 3 9 11 80
TMR_00404 0.21 0.11 0.42 10 67504 25 4 10 11 82
TMR_00427 0.55 0.32 0.94 31 67495 7 0 2 5 66
TMR_00443 0.41 0.27 0.64 28 67117 20 1 15 4 76
TMR_00451 0.17 0.11 0.25 10 63506 34 6 24 4 79
TMR_00458 0.18 0.09 0.38 8 63525 16 1 12 3 85
TMR_00469 0.50 0.31 0.79 31 64581 12 1 7 4 69
TMR_00472 0.50 0.30 0.83 29 64585 10 1 5 4 68
TMR_00519 0.28 0.18 0.44 17 63151 27 2 20 5 78
TMR_00520 0.34 0.19 0.59 19 63158 13 4 9 0 80
TMR_00522 0.38 0.20 0.73 19 63164 7 1 6 0 78
TMR_00528 0.40 0.23 0.71 22 63159 13 2 7 4 75
TMR_00540 0.30 0.18 0.50 19 73498 24 2 17 5 85
TMR_00568 0.33 0.17 0.65 17 60700 14 0 9 5 82
TMR_00571 0.37 0.19 0.70 19 60699 13 0 8 5 80
TMR_00580 0.35 0.19 0.66 19 60697 15 2 8 5 81
TMR_00584 0.31 0.15 0.63 15 61051 15 1 8 6 82
TMR_00586 0.36 0.20 0.68 19 61047 14 1 8 5 78
TMR_00616 0.46 0.28 0.76 28 67124 12 3 6 3 71
TMR_00699 0.32 0.17 0.61 17 67133 12 3 8 1 85
TMR_00702 0.42 0.24 0.73 24 67128 10 3 6 1 76
TMR_00703 0.52 0.35 0.78 35 67483 15 1 9 5 64

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.