CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) CRWrnafold
MCC 0.543 > 0.369
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.369 ± 0.048
Sensitivity 0.425 > 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.366
Total TP 1886 > 1659
Total TN 2904341 > 2902518
Total FP 1026 < 3145
Total FP CONTRA 246 < 506
Total FP INCONS 580 < 2370
Total FP COMP 200 < 269
Total FN 2547 < 2774
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CRWrnafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CRWrnafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1659
Total TN 2902518
Total FP 3145
Total FP CONTRA 506
Total FP INCONS 2370
Total FP COMP 269
Total FN 2774
Total Scores
MCC 0.369
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.369 ± 0.048
Sensitivity 0.374
Positive Predictive Value 0.366
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.35 0.35 0.35 31 45363 66 2 55 9 58
ASE_00090 0.61 0.61 0.61 62 55510 44 2 37 5 39
ASE_00135 0.46 0.46 0.46 50 63082 60 7 51 2 59
ASE_00153 0.68 0.68 0.67 50 57555 66 2 23 41 23
ASE_00215 0.46 0.44 0.47 44 48422 51 4 46 1 55
ASE_00328 0.56 0.54 0.58 60 72668 47 7 36 4 52
ASE_00361 0.47 0.45 0.50 57 75352 61 9 48 4 70
ASE_00441 0.82 0.76 0.89 85 64166 20 1 9 10 27
TMR_00017 0.49 0.47 0.51 48 67067 52 11 35 6 54
TMR_00018 0.58 0.60 0.57 55 64523 47 13 29 5 37
TMR_00042 0.32 0.32 0.32 31 62739 68 8 57 3 67
TMR_00046 0.42 0.43 0.41 41 62736 64 12 46 6 55
TMR_00048 0.13 0.14 0.13 13 64876 98 11 80 7 82
TMR_00080 0.25 0.26 0.24 25 70396 79 21 58 0 71
TMR_00082 0.22 0.22 0.21 21 67798 83 19 58 6 75
TMR_00123 0.60 0.58 0.63 59 66336 40 6 29 5 42
TMR_00137 0.26 0.27 0.25 24 60978 77 17 56 4 65
TMR_00142 0.45 0.46 0.45 47 70771 69 16 42 11 55
TMR_00207 0.30 0.31 0.30 32 72282 83 7 69 7 71
TMR_00257 0.51 0.52 0.50 51 67058 57 10 42 5 47
TMR_00271 0.32 0.33 0.32 30 64166 73 10 55 8 61
TMR_00332 0.31 0.31 0.31 31 67062 76 14 54 8 68
TMR_00366 0.28 0.29 0.27 29 67789 85 19 59 7 71
TMR_00378 0.33 0.34 0.32 33 67792 78 13 58 7 64
TMR_00404 0.20 0.22 0.18 20 67418 93 24 66 3 72
TMR_00427 0.16 0.16 0.15 16 67421 96 15 76 5 81
TMR_00443 0.41 0.42 0.41 44 67053 72 15 49 8 60
TMR_00451 0.26 0.27 0.26 24 63454 75 9 59 7 65
TMR_00458 0.10 0.11 0.10 10 63450 94 8 78 8 83
TMR_00469 0.41 0.43 0.39 43 64511 66 15 51 0 57
TMR_00472 0.30 0.32 0.28 31 64509 82 20 60 2 66
TMR_00519 0.13 0.14 0.12 13 63083 94 17 77 0 82
TMR_00520 0.23 0.23 0.23 23 63088 87 8 71 8 76
TMR_00522 0.07 0.07 0.07 7 63085 104 14 84 6 90
TMR_00528 0.26 0.26 0.27 25 63096 77 16 53 8 72
TMR_00540 0.36 0.37 0.36 38 73429 70 18 51 1 66
TMR_00568 0.36 0.37 0.36 37 60622 72 15 52 5 62
TMR_00571 0.50 0.49 0.52 49 60631 55 6 40 9 50
TMR_00580 0.27 0.26 0.28 26 60633 75 6 61 8 74
TMR_00584 0.55 0.58 0.53 56 60969 53 10 40 3 41
TMR_00586 0.27 0.27 0.27 26 60978 76 12 59 5 71
TMR_00616 0.42 0.43 0.40 43 67054 70 10 54 6 56
TMR_00699 0.45 0.45 0.44 46 67057 58 10 48 0 56
TMR_00702 0.32 0.32 0.33 32 67063 70 8 58 4 68
TMR_00703 0.41 0.41 0.41 41 67427 62 9 51 2 58

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.