CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Carnac(20)
MCC 0.543 > 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.423 ± 0.055
Sensitivity 0.425 > 0.249
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 < 0.827
Total TP 1886 > 1103
Total TN 2904341 < 2905720
Total FP 1026 > 259
Total FP CONTRA 246 > 50
Total FP INCONS 580 > 180
Total FP COMP 200 > 29
Total FN 2547 < 3330
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Carnac(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Carnac(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1103
Total TN 2905720
Total FP 259
Total FP CONTRA 50
Total FP INCONS 180
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 3330
Total Scores
MCC 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.423 ± 0.055
Sensitivity 0.249
Positive Predictive Value 0.827
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45451 0 0 0 0 89
ASE_00090 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 55611 0 0 0 0 101
ASE_00135 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 63190 0 0 0 0 109
ASE_00153 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 57626 4 1 3 0 73
ASE_00215 0.19 0.07 0.54 7 48503 6 0 6 0 92
ASE_00328 0.73 0.55 0.97 62 72707 8 0 2 6 50
ASE_00361 0.18 0.03 1.00 4 75462 0 0 0 0 123
ASE_00441 0.41 0.17 1.00 19 64242 0 0 0 0 93
TMR_00017 0.51 0.35 0.75 36 67113 12 1 11 0 66
TMR_00018 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64575 14 3 11 0 61
TMR_00042 0.55 0.35 0.87 34 62796 6 1 4 1 64
TMR_00046 0.59 0.35 1.00 34 62801 0 0 0 0 62
TMR_00048 0.43 0.26 0.71 25 64945 13 1 9 3 70
TMR_00080 0.27 0.17 0.44 16 70464 20 7 13 0 80
TMR_00082 0.48 0.31 0.75 30 67856 11 5 5 1 66
TMR_00123 0.36 0.13 1.00 13 66417 0 0 0 0 88
TMR_00137 0.44 0.19 1.00 17 61058 0 0 0 0 72
TMR_00142 0.41 0.20 0.87 20 70853 3 0 3 0 82
TMR_00207 0.41 0.25 0.67 26 72351 13 2 11 0 77
TMR_00257 0.56 0.35 0.92 34 67124 4 2 1 1 64
TMR_00271 0.37 0.21 0.66 19 64232 14 4 6 4 72
TMR_00332 0.55 0.33 0.92 33 67125 3 2 1 0 66
TMR_00366 0.46 0.22 0.96 22 67873 1 0 1 0 78
TMR_00378 0.47 0.23 0.96 22 67873 1 0 1 0 75
TMR_00404 0.63 0.41 0.95 38 67488 2 1 1 0 54
TMR_00427 0.23 0.05 1.00 5 67523 0 0 0 0 92
TMR_00443 0.64 0.50 0.81 52 67097 12 1 11 0 52
TMR_00451 0.52 0.31 0.85 28 63513 5 0 5 0 61
TMR_00458 0.59 0.38 0.92 35 63508 3 2 1 0 58
TMR_00469 0.41 0.17 1.00 17 64603 0 0 0 0 83
TMR_00472 0.49 0.24 1.00 23 64597 0 0 0 0 74
TMR_00519 0.47 0.23 0.96 22 63167 1 1 0 0 73
TMR_00520 0.48 0.23 1.00 23 63167 0 0 0 0 76
TMR_00522 0.27 0.07 1.00 7 63183 0 0 0 0 90
TMR_00528 0.27 0.07 1.00 7 63183 0 0 0 0 90
TMR_00540 0.61 0.40 0.91 42 73490 4 1 3 0 62
TMR_00568 0.58 0.42 0.79 42 60673 13 1 10 2 57
TMR_00571 0.63 0.46 0.85 46 60672 11 1 7 3 53
TMR_00580 0.58 0.42 0.81 42 60674 13 1 9 3 58
TMR_00584 0.65 0.46 0.92 45 61026 6 0 4 2 52
TMR_00586 0.53 0.39 0.72 38 61022 17 4 11 2 59
TMR_00616 0.41 0.17 1.00 17 67144 0 0 0 0 82
TMR_00699 0.42 0.25 0.74 25 67127 9 3 6 0 77
TMR_00702 0.38 0.20 0.71 20 67133 9 2 6 1 80
TMR_00703 0.37 0.25 0.54 25 67482 21 3 18 0 74

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.