CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) CentroidFold
MCC 0.543 > 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.495 ± 0.038
Sensitivity 0.425 < 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.574
Total TP 1886 < 1936
Total TN 2904341 > 2903678
Total FP 1026 < 1757
Total FP CONTRA 246 < 252
Total FP INCONS 580 < 1187
Total FP COMP 200 < 318
Total FN 2547 > 2497
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1936
Total TN 2903678
Total FP 1757
Total FP CONTRA 252
Total FP INCONS 1187
Total FP COMP 318
Total FN 2497
Total Scores
MCC 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.495 ± 0.038
Sensitivity 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.574
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.66 0.57 0.77 51 45385 25 1 14 10 38
ASE_00090 0.62 0.59 0.64 60 55517 39 4 30 5 41
ASE_00135 0.60 0.51 0.70 56 63110 31 1 23 7 53
ASE_00153 0.46 0.42 0.51 31 57569 56 5 25 26 42
ASE_00215 0.56 0.49 0.63 49 48438 30 2 27 1 50
ASE_00328 0.74 0.61 0.89 68 72695 13 1 7 5 44
ASE_00361 0.56 0.50 0.63 63 75366 40 4 33 3 64
ASE_00441 0.84 0.74 0.94 83 64173 9 0 5 4 29
TMR_00017 0.55 0.41 0.74 42 67104 19 0 15 4 60
TMR_00018 0.45 0.38 0.52 35 64553 36 10 22 4 57
TMR_00042 0.38 0.34 0.42 33 62757 48 6 39 3 65
TMR_00046 0.60 0.56 0.64 54 62750 37 4 27 6 42
TMR_00048 0.48 0.46 0.49 44 64890 55 8 38 9 51
TMR_00080 0.42 0.36 0.49 35 70428 37 7 30 0 61
TMR_00082 0.29 0.26 0.32 25 67818 53 9 44 0 71
TMR_00123 0.56 0.50 0.63 50 66350 35 3 27 5 51
TMR_00137 0.34 0.27 0.43 24 61019 40 3 29 8 65
TMR_00142 0.61 0.58 0.64 59 70784 46 8 25 13 43
TMR_00207 0.46 0.38 0.55 39 72319 37 4 28 5 64
TMR_00257 0.26 0.20 0.33 20 67101 45 1 39 5 78
TMR_00271 0.62 0.57 0.68 52 64184 36 6 19 11 39
TMR_00332 0.43 0.35 0.53 35 67095 36 1 30 5 64
TMR_00366 0.52 0.45 0.59 45 67820 42 11 20 11 55
TMR_00378 0.36 0.30 0.44 29 67830 47 8 29 10 68
TMR_00404 0.60 0.58 0.62 53 67443 49 6 26 17 39
TMR_00427 0.44 0.34 0.56 33 67469 31 8 18 5 64
TMR_00443 0.62 0.50 0.76 52 67093 23 6 10 7 52
TMR_00451 0.23 0.19 0.27 17 63483 50 12 34 4 72
TMR_00458 0.35 0.29 0.42 27 63481 45 8 30 7 66
TMR_00469 0.57 0.52 0.63 52 64537 35 10 21 4 48
TMR_00472 0.52 0.42 0.63 41 64555 29 6 18 5 56
TMR_00519 0.40 0.31 0.54 29 63136 38 5 20 13 66
TMR_00520 0.50 0.42 0.60 42 63120 38 4 24 10 57
TMR_00522 0.41 0.35 0.47 34 63118 47 8 30 9 63
TMR_00528 0.41 0.36 0.46 35 63114 51 12 29 10 62
TMR_00540 0.37 0.34 0.40 35 73449 60 7 45 8 69
TMR_00568 0.53 0.49 0.56 49 60639 44 4 34 6 50
TMR_00571 0.61 0.53 0.70 52 60652 30 6 16 8 47
TMR_00580 0.44 0.41 0.47 41 60638 50 10 37 3 59
TMR_00584 0.67 0.61 0.75 59 60996 30 1 19 10 38
TMR_00586 0.42 0.41 0.43 40 60981 59 10 44 5 57
TMR_00616 0.45 0.41 0.49 41 67078 50 9 33 8 58
TMR_00699 0.54 0.46 0.63 47 67086 33 3 25 5 55
TMR_00702 0.35 0.27 0.46 27 67102 39 5 27 7 73
TMR_00703 0.56 0.48 0.64 48 67453 34 5 22 7 51

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.