CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Contrafold
MCC 0.543 > 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.479 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.425 < 0.465
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.502
Total TP 1886 < 2060
Total TN 2904341 > 2902950
Total FP 1026 < 2424
Total FP CONTRA 246 < 383
Total FP INCONS 580 < 1660
Total FP COMP 200 < 381
Total FN 2547 > 2373
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2060
Total TN 2902950
Total FP 2424
Total FP CONTRA 383
Total FP INCONS 1660
Total FP COMP 381
Total FN 2373
Total Scores
MCC 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.479 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.465
Positive Predictive Value 0.502
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.60 0.56 0.65 50 45374 37 2 25 10 39
ASE_00090 0.67 0.67 0.66 68 55508 43 4 31 8 33
ASE_00135 0.63 0.57 0.69 62 63100 35 1 27 7 47
ASE_00153 0.41 0.42 0.40 31 57553 80 7 39 34 42
ASE_00215 0.54 0.51 0.57 50 48429 39 4 33 2 49
ASE_00328 0.63 0.59 0.67 66 72673 41 5 27 9 46
ASE_00361 0.64 0.61 0.67 77 75351 42 8 30 4 50
ASE_00441 0.82 0.76 0.89 85 64166 20 2 8 10 27
TMR_00017 0.49 0.44 0.54 45 67078 42 5 33 4 57
TMR_00018 0.38 0.37 0.40 34 64535 55 13 38 4 58
TMR_00042 0.29 0.30 0.29 29 62736 74 13 57 4 69
TMR_00046 0.60 0.58 0.62 56 62745 44 6 28 10 40
TMR_00048 0.40 0.41 0.40 39 64882 69 13 46 10 56
TMR_00080 0.43 0.42 0.44 40 70410 50 15 35 0 56
TMR_00082 0.29 0.28 0.30 27 67807 64 9 53 2 69
TMR_00123 0.53 0.51 0.55 52 66335 52 4 39 9 49
TMR_00137 0.37 0.34 0.41 30 61001 53 6 38 9 59
TMR_00142 0.57 0.58 0.56 59 70771 61 13 33 15 43
TMR_00207 0.43 0.40 0.48 41 72304 50 5 40 5 62
TMR_00257 0.25 0.22 0.27 22 67080 65 2 57 6 76
TMR_00271 0.64 0.62 0.67 56 64177 40 6 22 12 35
TMR_00332 0.45 0.40 0.50 40 67081 45 2 38 5 59
TMR_00366 0.52 0.50 0.53 50 67802 55 12 32 11 50
TMR_00378 0.24 0.25 0.24 24 67797 86 17 58 11 73
TMR_00404 0.56 0.58 0.55 53 67431 62 11 33 18 39
TMR_00427 0.45 0.42 0.48 41 67443 49 10 34 5 56
TMR_00443 0.57 0.51 0.65 53 67079 36 6 23 7 51
TMR_00451 0.19 0.19 0.18 17 63453 80 18 58 4 72
TMR_00458 0.32 0.30 0.35 28 63465 60 11 42 7 65
TMR_00469 0.53 0.53 0.53 53 64520 51 13 34 4 47
TMR_00472 0.64 0.64 0.64 62 64523 43 12 23 8 35
TMR_00519 0.33 0.32 0.35 30 63105 69 8 47 14 65
TMR_00520 0.44 0.41 0.48 41 63104 56 9 36 11 58
TMR_00522 0.36 0.35 0.38 34 63100 65 12 44 9 63
TMR_00528 0.36 0.36 0.35 35 63091 75 20 44 11 62
TMR_00540 0.35 0.35 0.36 36 73436 76 10 54 12 68
TMR_00568 0.51 0.51 0.53 50 60631 51 6 39 6 49
TMR_00571 0.65 0.64 0.66 63 60631 44 7 25 12 36
TMR_00580 0.41 0.41 0.41 41 60625 63 15 45 3 59
TMR_00584 0.63 0.61 0.65 59 60984 45 3 29 13 38
TMR_00586 0.41 0.41 0.41 40 60977 63 11 47 5 57
TMR_00616 0.42 0.41 0.42 41 67063 65 12 45 8 58
TMR_00699 0.67 0.62 0.72 63 67074 29 4 20 5 39
TMR_00702 0.36 0.32 0.40 32 67081 57 5 43 9 68
TMR_00703 0.59 0.56 0.62 55 67439 43 6 28 9 44

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.