CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) MaxExpect
MCC 0.543 > 0.460
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.458 ± 0.045
Sensitivity 0.425 < 0.448
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.474
Total TP 1886 < 1987
Total TN 2904341 > 2902864
Total FP 1026 < 2555
Total FP CONTRA 246 < 417
Total FP INCONS 580 < 1785
Total FP COMP 200 < 353
Total FN 2547 > 2446
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and MaxExpect).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and MaxExpect).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and MaxExpect).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1987
Total TN 2902864
Total FP 2555
Total FP CONTRA 417
Total FP INCONS 1785
Total FP COMP 353
Total FN 2446
Total Scores
MCC 0.460
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.458 ± 0.045
Sensitivity 0.448
Positive Predictive Value 0.474
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.39 0.39 0.38 35 45359 64 6 51 7 54
ASE_00090 0.67 0.67 0.67 68 55509 41 4 30 7 33
ASE_00135 0.66 0.63 0.68 69 63089 39 1 31 7 40
ASE_00153 0.57 0.59 0.54 43 57551 71 8 28 35 30
ASE_00215 0.60 0.58 0.63 57 48425 38 5 29 4 42
ASE_00328 0.67 0.63 0.73 70 72675 40 4 22 14 42
ASE_00361 0.54 0.53 0.56 67 75347 55 10 42 3 60
ASE_00441 0.79 0.74 0.84 83 64162 21 1 15 5 29
TMR_00017 0.51 0.49 0.53 50 67067 50 10 34 6 52
TMR_00018 0.37 0.37 0.37 34 64527 63 11 48 4 58
TMR_00042 0.35 0.35 0.36 34 62740 64 3 58 3 64
TMR_00046 0.28 0.28 0.28 27 62740 72 11 57 4 69
TMR_00048 0.23 0.24 0.23 23 64880 83 15 62 6 72
TMR_00080 0.41 0.40 0.42 38 70409 53 14 39 0 58
TMR_00082 0.70 0.68 0.71 65 67805 31 8 18 5 31
TMR_00123 0.40 0.39 0.41 39 66335 61 11 45 5 62
TMR_00137 0.22 0.21 0.22 19 60990 74 9 57 8 70
TMR_00142 0.50 0.51 0.50 52 70771 65 10 43 12 50
TMR_00207 0.29 0.28 0.30 29 72294 71 7 60 4 74
TMR_00257 0.12 0.11 0.12 11 67072 82 7 71 4 87
TMR_00271 0.64 0.60 0.67 55 64179 37 6 21 10 36
TMR_00332 0.49 0.43 0.54 43 67082 41 7 29 5 56
TMR_00366 0.51 0.51 0.52 51 67798 58 12 35 11 49
TMR_00378 0.26 0.25 0.28 24 67810 73 14 48 11 73
TMR_00404 0.37 0.40 0.35 37 67422 80 26 43 11 55
TMR_00427 0.34 0.32 0.36 31 67441 61 13 43 5 66
TMR_00443 0.54 0.51 0.57 53 67068 47 11 29 7 51
TMR_00451 0.18 0.19 0.18 17 63449 84 20 60 4 72
TMR_00458 0.46 0.46 0.46 43 63453 57 9 41 7 50
TMR_00469 0.53 0.53 0.52 53 64519 52 17 31 4 47
TMR_00472 0.42 0.40 0.44 39 64532 60 8 41 11 58
TMR_00519 0.39 0.39 0.40 37 63098 66 12 43 11 58
TMR_00520 0.52 0.52 0.53 51 63094 55 14 31 10 48
TMR_00522 0.39 0.39 0.40 38 63095 66 13 44 9 59
TMR_00528 0.30 0.29 0.32 28 63102 70 16 44 10 69
TMR_00540 0.44 0.41 0.47 43 73444 60 11 38 11 61
TMR_00568 0.36 0.34 0.38 34 60636 62 4 52 6 65
TMR_00571 0.66 0.61 0.71 60 60642 38 2 22 14 39
TMR_00580 0.68 0.64 0.72 64 60637 36 2 23 11 36
TMR_00584 0.59 0.57 0.61 55 60985 47 3 32 12 42
TMR_00586 0.50 0.49 0.51 48 60980 57 8 39 10 49
TMR_00616 0.41 0.40 0.41 40 67064 62 12 45 5 59
TMR_00699 0.49 0.44 0.55 45 67079 42 4 33 5 57
TMR_00702 0.39 0.36 0.42 36 67075 55 12 38 5 64
TMR_00703 0.50 0.49 0.52 49 67433 51 6 40 5 50

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.