CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & PknotsRG [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) PknotsRG
MCC 0.543 > 0.389
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.390 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.425 > 0.395
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.385
Total TP 1886 > 1752
Total TN 2904341 > 2902502
Total FP 1026 < 3092
Total FP CONTRA 246 < 488
Total FP INCONS 580 < 2311
Total FP COMP 200 < 293
Total FN 2547 < 2681
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and PknotsRG. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and PknotsRG).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and PknotsRG).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and PknotsRG. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and PknotsRG).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1752
Total TN 2902502
Total FP 3092
Total FP CONTRA 488
Total FP INCONS 2311
Total FP COMP 293
Total FN 2681
Total Scores
MCC 0.389
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.390 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.395
Positive Predictive Value 0.385
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.43 0.43 0.44 38 45364 53 5 44 4 51
ASE_00090 0.59 0.59 0.59 60 55509 47 2 40 5 41
ASE_00135 0.47 0.46 0.48 50 63085 59 8 47 4 59
ASE_00153 0.61 0.62 0.61 45 57556 71 2 27 42 28
ASE_00215 0.55 0.53 0.57 52 48425 42 4 35 3 47
ASE_00328 0.41 0.41 0.41 46 72659 73 3 63 7 66
ASE_00361 0.37 0.36 0.38 46 75345 78 9 66 3 81
ASE_00441 0.78 0.74 0.83 83 64161 28 1 16 11 29
TMR_00017 0.36 0.37 0.36 38 67055 74 15 53 6 64
TMR_00018 0.30 0.32 0.30 29 64522 75 10 59 6 63
TMR_00042 0.24 0.24 0.24 24 62735 79 9 67 3 74
TMR_00046 0.54 0.55 0.54 53 62736 49 11 35 3 43
TMR_00048 0.32 0.34 0.30 32 64875 78 9 64 5 63
TMR_00080 0.59 0.61 0.56 59 70395 49 16 30 3 37
TMR_00082 0.63 0.64 0.63 61 67799 41 12 24 5 35
TMR_00123 0.46 0.47 0.46 47 66327 57 11 45 1 54
TMR_00137 0.27 0.28 0.26 25 60980 78 14 56 8 64
TMR_00142 0.45 0.47 0.44 48 70767 70 15 46 9 54
TMR_00207 0.36 0.35 0.36 36 72291 70 4 59 7 67
TMR_00257 0.25 0.24 0.26 24 67068 73 8 61 4 74
TMR_00271 0.49 0.48 0.49 44 64171 54 8 38 8 47
TMR_00332 0.39 0.38 0.40 38 67065 62 9 49 4 61
TMR_00366 0.28 0.28 0.29 28 67798 83 12 58 13 72
TMR_00378 0.29 0.30 0.28 29 67791 87 7 69 11 68
TMR_00404 0.28 0.30 0.26 28 67421 90 22 57 11 64
TMR_00427 0.31 0.31 0.31 30 67432 71 11 55 5 67
TMR_00443 0.45 0.45 0.46 47 67058 58 14 42 2 57
TMR_00451 0.17 0.19 0.16 17 63441 88 16 72 0 72
TMR_00458 0.20 0.20 0.20 19 63449 85 19 59 7 74
TMR_00469 0.40 0.41 0.38 41 64513 66 11 55 0 59
TMR_00472 0.36 0.38 0.35 37 64514 72 24 45 3 60
TMR_00519 0.14 0.15 0.13 14 63086 100 16 74 10 81
TMR_00520 0.36 0.37 0.35 37 63085 78 13 55 10 62
TMR_00522 0.36 0.36 0.36 35 63092 72 11 52 9 62
TMR_00528 0.13 0.13 0.12 13 63082 105 12 83 10 84
TMR_00540 0.45 0.45 0.46 47 73433 65 4 52 9 57
TMR_00568 0.59 0.59 0.60 58 60630 47 3 35 9 41
TMR_00571 0.59 0.60 0.58 59 60625 47 7 35 5 40
TMR_00580 0.32 0.31 0.32 31 60630 70 13 52 5 69
TMR_00584 0.40 0.42 0.38 41 60967 72 8 59 5 56
TMR_00586 0.23 0.25 0.22 24 60964 88 18 69 1 73
TMR_00616 0.37 0.37 0.36 37 67058 71 18 48 5 62
TMR_00699 0.41 0.41 0.41 42 67059 63 10 50 3 60
TMR_00702 0.28 0.29 0.28 29 67057 80 18 57 5 71
TMR_00703 0.31 0.31 0.31 31 67427 74 16 54 4 68

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.