CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) ProbKnot
MCC 0.543 > 0.461
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.459 ± 0.045
Sensitivity 0.425 < 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.463
Total TP 1886 < 2038
Total TN 2904341 > 2902651
Total FP 1026 < 2748
Total FP CONTRA 246 < 501
Total FP INCONS 580 < 1863
Total FP COMP 200 < 384
Total FN 2547 > 2395
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2038
Total TN 2902651
Total FP 2748
Total FP CONTRA 501
Total FP INCONS 1863
Total FP COMP 384
Total FN 2395
Total Scores
MCC 0.461
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.459 ± 0.045
Sensitivity 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.463
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.38 0.39 0.38 35 45358 67 6 52 9 54
ASE_00090 0.67 0.67 0.66 68 55508 43 4 31 8 33
ASE_00135 0.65 0.64 0.66 70 63084 43 1 35 7 39
ASE_00153 0.62 0.67 0.58 49 57545 73 9 27 37 24
ASE_00215 0.60 0.58 0.63 57 48426 35 5 28 2 42
ASE_00328 0.68 0.66 0.70 74 72665 43 7 25 11 38
ASE_00361 0.54 0.54 0.54 69 75338 62 13 46 3 58
ASE_00441 0.78 0.74 0.82 83 64160 27 2 16 9 29
TMR_00017 0.50 0.49 0.51 50 67062 55 11 38 6 52
TMR_00018 0.34 0.36 0.32 33 64516 76 17 54 5 59
TMR_00042 0.34 0.35 0.33 34 62733 71 6 62 3 64
TMR_00046 0.27 0.28 0.27 27 62734 81 11 63 7 69
TMR_00048 0.26 0.27 0.24 26 64873 87 15 66 6 69
TMR_00080 0.39 0.40 0.38 38 70401 62 18 43 1 58
TMR_00082 0.69 0.71 0.67 68 67795 38 16 17 5 28
TMR_00123 0.46 0.48 0.45 48 66324 63 13 45 5 53
TMR_00137 0.24 0.25 0.24 22 60983 79 12 58 9 67
TMR_00142 0.55 0.56 0.55 57 70772 62 10 37 15 45
TMR_00207 0.34 0.35 0.33 36 72280 79 10 64 5 67
TMR_00257 0.12 0.11 0.13 11 67074 81 6 70 5 87
TMR_00271 0.59 0.56 0.61 51 64178 43 9 23 11 40
TMR_00332 0.53 0.51 0.55 50 67070 47 10 31 6 49
TMR_00366 0.57 0.55 0.59 55 67803 49 8 30 11 45
TMR_00378 0.26 0.28 0.25 27 67786 94 24 59 11 70
TMR_00404 0.36 0.40 0.33 37 67416 86 29 46 11 55
TMR_00427 0.46 0.44 0.48 43 67439 54 11 35 8 54
TMR_00443 0.50 0.48 0.53 50 67066 52 13 32 7 54
TMR_00451 0.18 0.19 0.17 17 63445 88 21 63 4 72
TMR_00458 0.46 0.44 0.47 41 63459 54 11 35 8 52
TMR_00469 0.51 0.53 0.50 53 64514 57 18 35 4 47
TMR_00472 0.46 0.45 0.46 44 64524 64 10 42 12 53
TMR_00519 0.40 0.38 0.42 36 63105 64 10 39 15 59
TMR_00520 0.51 0.49 0.52 49 63096 56 15 30 11 50
TMR_00522 0.39 0.39 0.38 38 63091 70 16 45 9 59
TMR_00528 0.30 0.29 0.31 28 63099 73 18 45 10 69
TMR_00540 0.36 0.35 0.37 36 73438 74 14 48 12 68
TMR_00568 0.31 0.30 0.31 30 60629 73 6 61 6 69
TMR_00571 0.62 0.61 0.64 60 60632 46 6 28 12 39
TMR_00580 0.69 0.66 0.72 66 60634 37 3 23 11 34
TMR_00584 0.58 0.57 0.59 55 60982 53 5 33 15 42
TMR_00586 0.52 0.51 0.54 49 60984 52 8 34 10 48
TMR_00616 0.39 0.40 0.38 40 67057 69 13 51 5 59
TMR_00699 0.45 0.42 0.48 43 67072 52 7 39 6 59
TMR_00702 0.40 0.38 0.42 38 67071 58 13 39 6 62
TMR_00703 0.48 0.47 0.48 47 67430 56 11 40 5 52

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.