CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.543 > 0.374
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.374 ± 0.036
Sensitivity 0.425 > 0.356
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.396
Total TP 1886 > 1579
Total TN 2904341 > 2903061
Total FP 1026 < 2646
Total FP CONTRA 246 < 397
Total FP INCONS 580 < 2016
Total FP COMP 200 < 233
Total FN 2547 < 2854
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1579
Total TN 2903061
Total FP 2646
Total FP CONTRA 397
Total FP INCONS 2016
Total FP COMP 233
Total FN 2854
Total Scores
MCC 0.374
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.374 ± 0.036
Sensitivity 0.356
Positive Predictive Value 0.396
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.49 0.46 0.52 41 45372 43 4 34 5 48
ASE_00090 0.46 0.45 0.47 45 55515 52 8 43 1 56
ASE_00135 0.32 0.29 0.34 32 63097 66 3 58 5 77
ASE_00153 0.49 0.53 0.46 39 57545 68 15 31 22 34
ASE_00215 0.54 0.48 0.59 48 48435 34 3 30 1 51
ASE_00328 0.58 0.54 0.63 60 72676 39 5 30 4 52
ASE_00361 0.51 0.46 0.56 59 75360 48 2 45 1 68
ASE_00441 0.55 0.49 0.62 55 64172 34 3 31 0 57
TMR_00017 0.29 0.27 0.32 28 67073 64 7 53 4 74
TMR_00018 0.36 0.36 0.36 33 64528 61 12 47 2 59
TMR_00042 0.30 0.30 0.31 29 62742 66 10 54 2 69
TMR_00046 0.40 0.40 0.41 38 62742 59 10 45 4 58
TMR_00048 0.53 0.53 0.54 50 64887 48 15 28 5 45
TMR_00080 0.26 0.27 0.26 26 70399 75 26 49 0 70
TMR_00082 0.57 0.54 0.59 52 67808 39 12 24 3 44
TMR_00123 0.43 0.39 0.47 39 66347 49 5 39 5 62
TMR_00137 0.18 0.19 0.18 17 60980 79 17 61 1 72
TMR_00142 0.55 0.52 0.58 53 70785 47 8 30 9 49
TMR_00207 0.10 0.10 0.11 10 72296 88 6 78 4 93
TMR_00257 0.26 0.24 0.28 24 67074 68 9 54 5 74
TMR_00271 0.41 0.38 0.43 35 64180 53 15 31 7 56
TMR_00332 0.31 0.28 0.34 28 67079 58 9 45 4 71
TMR_00366 0.44 0.42 0.47 42 67806 52 11 37 4 58
TMR_00378 0.42 0.40 0.44 39 67808 53 12 37 4 58
TMR_00404 0.35 0.37 0.34 34 67428 74 11 55 8 58
TMR_00427 0.38 0.37 0.40 36 67438 61 8 46 7 61
TMR_00443 0.32 0.28 0.36 29 67080 58 5 47 6 75
TMR_00451 0.25 0.22 0.28 20 63475 55 7 44 4 69
TMR_00458 0.26 0.25 0.28 23 63464 69 8 51 10 70
TMR_00469 0.34 0.33 0.35 33 64525 62 10 52 0 67
TMR_00472 0.23 0.24 0.23 23 64522 77 18 57 2 74
TMR_00519 0.24 0.24 0.24 23 63095 82 13 59 10 72
TMR_00520 0.31 0.29 0.33 29 63102 70 5 54 11 70
TMR_00522 0.25 0.24 0.27 23 63104 74 11 52 11 74
TMR_00528 0.13 0.12 0.14 12 63102 86 8 68 10 85
TMR_00540 0.44 0.42 0.45 44 73438 55 15 39 1 60
TMR_00568 0.33 0.31 0.34 31 60635 66 9 51 6 68
TMR_00571 0.35 0.33 0.38 33 60639 62 8 46 8 66
TMR_00580 0.37 0.34 0.40 34 60642 55 8 42 5 66
TMR_00584 0.46 0.43 0.48 42 60988 52 5 40 7 55
TMR_00586 0.46 0.38 0.55 37 61008 35 1 29 5 60
TMR_00616 0.44 0.43 0.46 43 67067 56 8 43 5 56
TMR_00699 0.52 0.45 0.61 46 67085 34 0 30 4 56
TMR_00702 0.41 0.38 0.44 38 67074 56 7 42 7 62
TMR_00703 0.26 0.24 0.29 24 67444 64 5 55 4 75

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.