CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.543 > 0.370
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.371 ± 0.045
Sensitivity 0.425 > 0.372
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.370
Total TP 1886 > 1651
Total TN 2904341 > 2902595
Total FP 1026 < 3117
Total FP CONTRA 246 < 492
Total FP INCONS 580 < 2315
Total FP COMP 200 < 310
Total FN 2547 < 2782
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1651
Total TN 2902595
Total FP 3117
Total FP CONTRA 492
Total FP INCONS 2315
Total FP COMP 310
Total FN 2782
Total Scores
MCC 0.370
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.371 ± 0.045
Sensitivity 0.372
Positive Predictive Value 0.370
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.32 0.31 0.32 28 45363 69 4 56 9 61
ASE_00090 0.59 0.59 0.59 60 55509 47 2 40 5 41
ASE_00135 0.46 0.45 0.47 49 63085 59 8 48 3 60
ASE_00153 0.67 0.68 0.66 50 57554 68 2 24 42 23
ASE_00215 0.58 0.55 0.62 54 48429 35 7 26 2 45
ASE_00328 0.40 0.40 0.41 45 72660 73 3 63 7 67
ASE_00361 0.49 0.46 0.51 59 75351 59 7 49 3 68
ASE_00441 0.77 0.72 0.82 81 64162 30 2 16 12 31
TMR_00017 0.38 0.38 0.39 39 67060 68 15 47 6 63
TMR_00018 0.25 0.26 0.24 24 64521 81 11 64 6 68
TMR_00042 0.29 0.30 0.29 29 62736 73 8 62 3 69
TMR_00046 0.56 0.56 0.57 54 62740 47 7 34 6 42
TMR_00048 0.33 0.35 0.31 33 64874 78 9 64 5 62
TMR_00080 0.61 0.61 0.61 59 70403 41 10 28 3 37
TMR_00082 0.59 0.58 0.60 56 67802 43 12 26 5 40
TMR_00123 0.17 0.17 0.17 17 66327 92 11 75 6 84
TMR_00137 0.16 0.17 0.16 15 60979 89 14 67 8 74
TMR_00142 0.57 0.61 0.54 62 70761 53 21 32 0 40
TMR_00207 0.25 0.24 0.26 25 72292 80 6 67 7 78
TMR_00257 0.20 0.19 0.20 19 67068 78 8 66 4 79
TMR_00271 0.47 0.46 0.48 42 64173 54 7 39 8 49
TMR_00332 0.28 0.27 0.29 27 67067 71 14 53 4 72
TMR_00366 0.31 0.30 0.31 30 67800 79 10 56 13 70
TMR_00378 0.29 0.30 0.28 29 67792 86 7 68 11 68
TMR_00404 0.21 0.23 0.20 21 67425 94 23 59 12 71
TMR_00427 0.33 0.33 0.33 32 67430 69 11 55 3 65
TMR_00443 0.37 0.38 0.36 39 67053 71 13 56 2 65
TMR_00451 0.22 0.24 0.21 21 63448 83 14 63 6 68
TMR_00458 0.15 0.15 0.15 14 63450 89 19 63 7 79
TMR_00469 0.40 0.41 0.39 41 64514 65 11 54 0 59
TMR_00472 0.33 0.33 0.33 32 64523 77 10 55 12 65
TMR_00519 0.19 0.20 0.18 19 63084 97 18 69 10 76
TMR_00520 0.46 0.46 0.46 46 63090 64 12 42 10 53
TMR_00522 0.36 0.36 0.36 35 63094 70 11 50 9 62
TMR_00528 0.30 0.31 0.29 30 63086 84 20 54 10 67
TMR_00540 0.42 0.41 0.43 43 73435 66 10 48 8 61
TMR_00568 0.35 0.34 0.37 34 60633 65 9 50 6 65
TMR_00571 0.32 0.32 0.32 32 60626 75 12 56 7 67
TMR_00580 0.26 0.26 0.25 26 60624 77 19 57 1 74
TMR_00584 0.52 0.51 0.53 49 60982 55 7 37 11 48
TMR_00586 0.23 0.25 0.22 24 60965 87 18 68 1 73
TMR_00616 0.35 0.34 0.35 34 67064 68 14 49 5 65
TMR_00699 0.39 0.37 0.40 38 67066 61 7 50 4 64
TMR_00702 0.19 0.19 0.20 19 67065 80 17 60 3 81
TMR_00703 0.36 0.36 0.37 36 67430 67 12 50 5 63

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.