CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Vsfold4
MCC 0.543 > 0.245
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.245 ± 0.034
Sensitivity 0.425 > 0.229
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.265
Total TP 1886 > 1016
Total TN 2904341 > 2903220
Total FP 1026 < 3068
Total FP CONTRA 246 < 412
Total FP INCONS 580 < 2405
Total FP COMP 200 < 251
Total FN 2547 < 3417
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1016
Total TN 2903220
Total FP 3068
Total FP CONTRA 412
Total FP INCONS 2405
Total FP COMP 251
Total FN 3417
Total Scores
MCC 0.245
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.245 ± 0.034
Sensitivity 0.229
Positive Predictive Value 0.265
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.47 0.42 0.54 37 45382 38 0 32 6 52
ASE_00090 0.48 0.46 0.51 46 55521 46 4 40 2 55
ASE_00135 0.38 0.35 0.42 38 63100 57 8 44 5 71
ASE_00153 0.38 0.37 0.39 27 57561 65 9 33 23 46
ASE_00215 0.47 0.41 0.53 41 48438 38 7 30 1 58
ASE_00328 0.43 0.39 0.48 44 72679 54 4 44 6 68
ASE_00361 0.37 0.32 0.43 41 75371 54 2 52 0 86
ASE_00441 0.36 0.32 0.41 36 64173 52 0 52 0 76
TMR_00017 0.33 0.29 0.37 30 67080 55 4 47 4 72
TMR_00018 0.24 0.23 0.25 21 64536 67 11 52 4 71
TMR_00042 0.20 0.18 0.22 18 62753 67 12 52 3 80
TMR_00046 0.25 0.25 0.26 24 62741 75 15 55 5 72
TMR_00048 0.23 0.22 0.24 21 64894 71 14 51 6 74
TMR_00080 0.14 0.14 0.14 13 70410 79 15 62 2 83
TMR_00082 0.24 0.23 0.26 22 67811 65 9 54 2 74
TMR_00123 0.35 0.33 0.38 33 66344 58 7 46 5 68
TMR_00137 0.08 0.08 0.09 7 60996 81 8 64 9 82
TMR_00142 0.09 0.09 0.10 9 70782 92 13 72 7 93
TMR_00207 0.17 0.17 0.18 17 72293 85 16 64 5 86
TMR_00257 0.10 0.09 0.11 9 67077 79 7 68 4 89
TMR_00271 0.21 0.19 0.23 17 64188 64 6 50 8 74
TMR_00332 0.19 0.17 0.21 17 67081 68 7 56 5 82
TMR_00366 0.17 0.16 0.18 16 67807 79 13 60 6 84
TMR_00378 0.20 0.20 0.20 19 67800 82 13 64 5 78
TMR_00404 0.28 0.28 0.27 26 67433 70 22 47 1 66
TMR_00427 0.12 0.11 0.13 11 67445 79 8 64 7 86
TMR_00443 0.17 0.14 0.20 15 67085 65 3 58 4 89
TMR_00451 0.17 0.16 0.18 14 63470 66 13 49 4 75
TMR_00458 0.16 0.15 0.17 14 63464 78 9 59 10 79
TMR_00469 0.34 0.33 0.34 33 64524 70 11 52 7 67
TMR_00472 0.35 0.35 0.35 34 64524 68 12 50 6 63
TMR_00519 0.23 0.22 0.25 21 63105 74 12 52 10 74
TMR_00520 0.23 0.21 0.24 21 63103 71 13 53 5 78
TMR_00522 0.12 0.11 0.14 11 63109 79 11 59 9 86
TMR_00528 0.08 0.07 0.09 7 63109 83 16 58 9 90
TMR_00540 0.09 0.09 0.10 9 73449 89 6 72 11 95
TMR_00568 0.14 0.13 0.16 13 60644 75 6 63 6 86
TMR_00571 0.19 0.18 0.20 18 60637 72 7 64 1 81
TMR_00580 0.28 0.27 0.30 27 60635 65 9 55 1 73
TMR_00584 0.37 0.34 0.40 33 60993 56 8 41 7 64
TMR_00586 0.25 0.23 0.27 22 60993 66 7 53 6 75
TMR_00616 0.28 0.26 0.30 26 67075 66 9 51 6 73
TMR_00699 0.15 0.14 0.17 14 67078 73 14 55 4 88
TMR_00702 0.17 0.15 0.19 15 67081 72 7 58 7 85
TMR_00703 0.32 0.29 0.35 29 67446 60 5 48 7 70

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.