CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Vsfold5
MCC 0.543 > 0.244
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032 > 0.236 ± 0.035
Sensitivity 0.425 > 0.234
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.256
Total TP 1886 > 1039
Total TN 2904341 > 2903002
Total FP 1026 < 3245
Total FP CONTRA 246 < 424
Total FP INCONS 580 < 2588
Total FP COMP 200 < 233
Total FN 2547 < 3394
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1039
Total TN 2903002
Total FP 3245
Total FP CONTRA 424
Total FP INCONS 2588
Total FP COMP 233
Total FN 3394
Total Scores
MCC 0.244
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.236 ± 0.035
Sensitivity 0.234
Positive Predictive Value 0.256
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.39 0.37 0.40 33 45369 55 1 48 6 56
ASE_00090 0.50 0.50 0.52 50 55514 50 4 43 3 51
ASE_00135 0.35 0.32 0.38 35 63097 63 3 55 5 74
ASE_00153 0.28 0.32 0.26 23 57540 91 12 55 24 50
ASE_00215 0.49 0.43 0.57 43 48440 37 6 27 4 56
ASE_00328 0.37 0.35 0.39 39 72671 67 4 57 6 73
ASE_00361 0.35 0.32 0.38 41 75357 68 9 59 0 86
ASE_00441 0.33 0.30 0.35 34 64164 63 6 57 0 78
TMR_00017 0.29 0.28 0.29 29 67062 74 8 62 4 73
TMR_00018 0.27 0.27 0.27 25 64528 72 10 57 5 67
TMR_00042 0.15 0.15 0.15 15 62738 86 16 66 4 83
TMR_00046 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 62835 0 0 0 0 96
TMR_00048 0.25 0.26 0.25 25 64879 82 15 61 6 70
TMR_00080 0.35 0.38 0.32 36 70388 76 16 60 0 60
TMR_00082 0.39 0.40 0.38 38 67796 62 11 51 0 58
TMR_00123 0.28 0.28 0.29 28 66332 75 9 61 5 73
TMR_00137 0.15 0.15 0.15 13 60990 82 6 66 10 76
TMR_00142 0.16 0.17 0.15 17 70764 98 20 75 3 85
TMR_00207 0.16 0.17 0.17 17 72287 91 9 77 5 86
TMR_00257 0.17 0.16 0.18 16 67070 80 6 69 5 82
TMR_00271 0.17 0.18 0.17 16 64166 88 15 64 9 75
TMR_00332 0.16 0.15 0.16 15 67068 83 6 72 5 84
TMR_00366 0.26 0.26 0.26 26 67796 80 13 61 6 74
TMR_00378 0.11 0.11 0.10 11 67790 100 15 80 5 86
TMR_00404 0.26 0.27 0.25 25 67428 83 15 60 8 67
TMR_00427 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 67528 0 0 0 0 97
TMR_00443 0.15 0.14 0.16 15 67066 84 8 72 4 89
TMR_00451 0.37 0.38 0.36 34 63451 65 16 45 4 55
TMR_00458 0.14 0.14 0.14 13 63451 89 13 69 7 80
TMR_00469 0.12 0.12 0.12 12 64521 92 8 79 5 88
TMR_00472 0.27 0.28 0.27 27 64520 80 4 69 7 70
TMR_00519 0.12 0.12 0.13 11 63107 82 11 61 10 84
TMR_00520 0.26 0.27 0.25 27 63084 79 13 66 0 72
TMR_00522 0.17 0.16 0.17 16 63096 83 17 61 5 81
TMR_00528 0.31 0.31 0.31 30 63092 73 16 52 5 67
TMR_00540 0.17 0.16 0.17 17 73438 89 10 71 8 87
TMR_00568 0.16 0.15 0.17 15 60636 81 3 72 6 84
TMR_00571 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 60726 0 0 0 0 99
TMR_00580 0.23 0.23 0.24 23 60629 80 8 66 6 77
TMR_00584 0.18 0.19 0.18 18 60977 85 11 69 5 79
TMR_00586 0.16 0.15 0.16 15 60984 85 11 65 9 82
TMR_00616 0.32 0.31 0.32 31 67064 72 11 55 6 68
TMR_00699 0.28 0.28 0.27 29 67054 82 14 64 4 73
TMR_00702 0.26 0.25 0.28 25 67072 71 8 56 7 75
TMR_00703 0.33 0.31 0.34 31 67437 67 7 53 7 68

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.