CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.496 > 0.350
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.480 ± 0.111 > 0.358 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.505 > 0.159
Positive Predictive Value 0.488 < 0.770
Total TP 743 > 234
Total TN 1035127 < 1036346
Total FP 958 > 77
Total FP CONTRA 157 > 3
Total FP INCONS 623 > 67
Total FP COMP 178 > 7
Total FN 727 < 1236
P-value 3.42071836373e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 743
Total TN 1035127
Total FP 958
Total FP CONTRA 157
Total FP INCONS 623
Total FP COMP 178
Total FN 727
Total Scores
MCC 0.496
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.480 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.505
Positive Predictive Value 0.488
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.21 0.22 0.21 25 103620 117 13 82 22 90
CRW_00016 0.60 0.58 0.63 70 77309 55 5 37 13 50
CRW_00610 0.49 0.51 0.48 41 36230 44 9 35 0 40
CRW_00613 0.66 0.62 0.71 48 34912 28 1 19 8 30
CRW_00614 0.16 0.19 0.13 11 121684 137 27 49 61 46
CRW_00618 0.07 0.08 0.07 5 56205 92 15 55 22 56
CRW_00633 0.40 0.42 0.39 44 63434 70 10 58 2 62
CRW_00634 0.50 0.53 0.48 50 64516 59 11 43 5 44
CRW_00670 0.62 0.61 0.63 73 70009 45 9 34 2 47
CRW_00671 0.65 0.63 0.67 74 62725 43 1 35 7 43
CRW_00672 0.74 0.75 0.74 83 72278 38 6 23 9 28
CRW_00674 0.60 0.61 0.59 76 83308 55 10 42 3 48
CRW_00676 0.56 0.58 0.54 67 93403 71 15 43 13 48
CRW_00692 0.34 0.37 0.32 33 68532 80 22 48 10 57
PDB_00827 0.59 0.53 0.65 43 26962 24 3 20 1 38

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 234
Total TN 1036346
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 1236
Total Scores
MCC 0.350
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.358 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.159
Positive Predictive Value 0.770
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.