CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.728 > 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.727 ± 0.026 > 0.151 ± 0.029
Sensitivity 0.674 > 0.174
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 > 0.135
Total TP 3479 > 901
Total TN 2956054 > 2953821
Total FP 1203 < 5867
Total FP CONTRA 140 < 780
Total FP INCONS 800 < 4971
Total FP COMP 263 > 116
Total FN 1686 < 4264
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3479
Total TN 2956054
Total FP 1203
Total FP CONTRA 140
Total FP INCONS 800
Total FP COMP 263
Total FN 1686
Total Scores
MCC 0.728
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.727 ± 0.026
Sensitivity 0.674
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.83 0.77 0.89 85 62386 12 0 10 2 25
ASE_00185 0.77 0.72 0.84 92 73426 23 1 17 5 36
ASE_00190 0.64 0.52 0.78 47 45391 16 1 12 3 43
ASE_00221 0.76 0.68 0.85 79 64527 19 1 13 5 38
ASE_00228 0.80 0.76 0.84 65 46894 17 3 9 5 21
ASE_00229 0.76 0.74 0.78 64 42404 20 5 13 2 23
ASE_00231 0.81 0.78 0.84 75 47806 15 4 10 1 21
ASE_00234 0.67 0.58 0.77 75 75369 25 2 20 3 54
ASE_00238 0.71 0.65 0.78 74 64166 24 4 17 3 40
ASE_00248 0.71 0.65 0.77 74 62385 26 0 22 4 40
ASE_00254 0.83 0.78 0.88 64 36783 16 3 6 7 18
ASE_00255 0.72 0.65 0.79 85 74583 25 2 21 2 45
ASE_00257 0.78 0.73 0.84 71 50955 19 1 13 5 26
ASE_00267 0.75 0.68 0.83 60 45078 22 0 12 10 28
ASE_00270 0.74 0.69 0.79 88 72279 28 2 21 5 40
ASE_00274 0.66 0.56 0.77 58 55536 21 3 14 4 45
ASE_00277 0.71 0.62 0.81 56 48136 15 1 12 2 35
ASE_00279 0.79 0.73 0.85 74 53214 17 2 11 4 27
ASE_00285 0.76 0.69 0.84 84 68906 23 2 14 7 38
ASE_00287 0.78 0.72 0.84 74 54858 19 2 12 5 29
ASE_00294 0.82 0.74 0.91 127 114342 18 1 11 6 44
ASE_00298 0.55 0.49 0.63 55 67441 34 1 31 2 58
ASE_00318 0.76 0.70 0.83 83 80100 24 5 12 7 35
ASE_00335 0.78 0.72 0.83 84 75365 26 5 12 9 32
ASE_00340 0.76 0.74 0.79 63 45976 24 4 13 7 22
ASE_00367 0.73 0.69 0.79 59 42996 26 0 16 10 27
ASE_00370 0.83 0.77 0.89 65 41832 15 0 8 7 19
ASE_00372 0.69 0.64 0.74 64 51916 25 3 20 2 36
ASE_00376 0.71 0.68 0.76 71 56859 26 1 22 3 34
ASE_00377 0.83 0.79 0.87 85 57532 18 2 11 5 22
ASE_00386 0.79 0.76 0.82 73 50314 21 0 16 5 23
ASE_00393 0.66 0.59 0.74 55 47821 26 1 18 7 38
ASE_00412 0.67 0.63 0.73 66 58220 28 3 22 3 39
ASE_00413 0.69 0.67 0.71 54 44475 26 5 17 4 27
ASE_00416 0.79 0.76 0.82 97 77303 29 3 18 8 30
ASE_00422 0.80 0.78 0.83 73 46883 21 3 12 6 21
ASE_00428 0.77 0.74 0.81 92 76522 28 3 19 6 33
ASE_00430 0.75 0.74 0.77 72 46877 23 5 17 1 25
ASE_00437 0.55 0.50 0.62 67 79293 43 1 40 2 68
ASE_00451 0.76 0.70 0.82 88 70769 24 1 18 5 37
TMR_00123 0.66 0.60 0.72 61 66345 29 3 21 5 40
TMR_00399 0.44 0.41 0.46 39 64896 52 12 33 7 55
TMR_00443 0.61 0.57 0.66 59 67071 35 5 26 4 45
TMR_00469 0.78 0.74 0.83 74 64531 24 5 10 9 26
TMR_00519 0.52 0.48 0.56 46 63108 47 11 25 11 49
TMR_00528 0.54 0.52 0.57 50 63102 48 12 26 10 47
TMR_00571 0.78 0.73 0.84 72 60640 27 2 12 13 27
TMR_00584 0.78 0.71 0.86 69 60995 21 3 8 10 28
TMR_00703 0.81 0.73 0.90 72 67448 13 1 7 5 27

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 901
Total TN 2953821
Total FP 5867
Total FP CONTRA 780
Total FP INCONS 4971
Total FP COMP 116
Total FN 4264
Total Scores
MCC 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.151 ± 0.029
Sensitivity 0.174
Positive Predictive Value 0.135
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.22 0.25 0.20 27 62347 108 12 95 1 83
ASE_00185 0.17 0.19 0.16 24 73382 134 14 116 4 104
ASE_00190 0.24 0.28 0.21 25 45334 93 14 78 1 65
ASE_00221 0.20 0.21 0.18 25 64484 112 10 101 1 92
ASE_00228 0.05 0.06 0.04 5 46858 109 17 91 1 81
ASE_00229 0.12 0.14 0.11 12 42380 97 12 82 3 75
ASE_00231 0.37 0.42 0.33 40 47773 84 17 65 2 56
ASE_00234 0.25 0.27 0.23 35 75315 117 10 106 1 94
ASE_00238 0.26 0.30 0.23 34 64111 119 18 98 3 80
ASE_00248 0.13 0.15 0.12 17 62340 124 9 115 0 97
ASE_00254 0.15 0.16 0.14 13 36761 88 3 79 6 69
ASE_00255 0.11 0.12 0.10 16 74530 146 16 129 1 114
ASE_00257 0.37 0.42 0.33 41 50917 85 15 67 3 56
ASE_00267 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45036 115 9 105 1 88
ASE_00270 0.19 0.21 0.17 27 72232 132 14 117 1 101
ASE_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 55487 126 12 112 2 103
ASE_00277 0.10 0.12 0.08 11 48071 123 23 100 0 80
ASE_00279 0.14 0.16 0.13 16 53177 109 16 92 1 85
ASE_00285 0.34 0.36 0.31 44 68866 98 14 82 2 78
ASE_00287 0.15 0.17 0.14 17 54824 107 14 91 2 86
ASE_00294 0.12 0.13 0.12 23 114287 172 11 160 1 148
ASE_00298 0.09 0.10 0.08 11 67389 129 8 120 1 102
ASE_00318 0.03 0.04 0.03 5 80039 156 21 135 0 113
ASE_00335 0.10 0.12 0.09 14 75304 151 22 126 3 102
ASE_00340 0.06 0.07 0.05 6 45943 110 13 94 3 79
ASE_00367 0.08 0.09 0.07 8 42960 110 10 93 7 78
ASE_00370 0.03 0.04 0.03 3 41796 109 18 88 3 81
ASE_00372 0.17 0.20 0.15 20 51871 113 19 93 1 80
ASE_00376 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56822 136 9 122 5 105
ASE_00377 0.25 0.27 0.23 29 57505 98 10 86 2 78
ASE_00386 0.14 0.16 0.13 15 50284 106 9 95 2 81
ASE_00393 0.31 0.35 0.27 33 47773 90 18 71 1 60
ASE_00412 0.15 0.17 0.14 18 58183 111 14 96 1 87
ASE_00413 0.08 0.10 0.07 8 44438 108 19 86 3 73
ASE_00416 0.39 0.43 0.35 54 77267 103 18 82 3 73
ASE_00422 0.28 0.31 0.25 29 46856 87 9 77 1 65
ASE_00428 0.24 0.26 0.22 33 76483 121 13 107 1 92
ASE_00430 0.16 0.18 0.14 17 46852 102 10 92 0 80
ASE_00437 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 79238 164 12 151 1 135
ASE_00451 0.20 0.22 0.19 27 70731 118 8 110 0 98
TMR_00123 0.19 0.23 0.16 23 66283 126 20 104 2 78
TMR_00399 0.20 0.26 0.16 24 64833 130 38 85 7 70
TMR_00443 0.17 0.20 0.15 21 67018 126 24 98 4 83
TMR_00469 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 64469 145 27 112 6 88
TMR_00519 0.04 0.05 0.03 5 63046 141 33 106 2 90
TMR_00528 0.13 0.15 0.11 15 63051 131 20 104 7 82
TMR_00571 0.05 0.06 0.04 6 60577 149 19 124 6 93
TMR_00584 0.01 0.01 0.01 1 60922 159 33 119 7 96
TMR_00703 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 67376 140 26 114 0 87

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.