CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.663 > 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.662 ± 0.030 > 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.610 > 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.720 > 0.695
Total TP 2706 > 1886
Total TN 2903297 < 2904341
Total FP 1406 > 1026
Total FP CONTRA 228 < 246
Total FP INCONS 822 > 580
Total FP COMP 356 > 200
Total FN 1727 < 2547
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2706
Total TN 2903297
Total FP 1406
Total FP CONTRA 228
Total FP INCONS 822
Total FP COMP 356
Total FN 1727
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.662 ± 0.030
Sensitivity 0.610
Positive Predictive Value 0.720
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.78 0.71 0.85 63 45377 19 0 11 8 26
ASE_00090 0.69 0.66 0.72 67 55518 31 1 25 5 34
ASE_00135 0.77 0.71 0.84 77 63098 26 0 15 11 32
ASE_00153 0.67 0.67 0.67 49 57557 63 2 22 39 24
ASE_00215 0.65 0.55 0.78 54 48447 23 0 15 8 45
ASE_00328 0.74 0.63 0.86 71 72688 24 1 11 12 41
ASE_00361 0.63 0.54 0.73 68 75373 26 0 25 1 59
ASE_00441 0.78 0.69 0.89 77 64174 11 0 10 1 35
TMR_00017 0.60 0.55 0.67 56 67077 32 7 21 4 46
TMR_00018 0.49 0.49 0.49 45 64529 50 12 34 4 47
TMR_00042 0.74 0.69 0.78 68 62748 25 2 17 6 30
TMR_00046 0.64 0.60 0.67 58 62749 34 4 24 6 38
TMR_00048 0.68 0.66 0.71 63 64891 35 6 20 9 32
TMR_00080 0.64 0.53 0.76 51 70433 16 6 10 0 45
TMR_00082 0.63 0.54 0.73 52 67825 20 6 13 1 44
TMR_00123 0.66 0.60 0.72 61 66345 29 3 21 5 40
TMR_00137 0.52 0.47 0.57 42 61001 37 9 23 5 47
TMR_00142 0.66 0.65 0.67 66 70778 40 8 24 8 36
TMR_00207 0.50 0.47 0.53 48 72300 47 8 34 5 55
TMR_00257 0.68 0.59 0.78 58 67087 22 1 15 6 40
TMR_00271 0.65 0.62 0.69 56 64180 34 6 19 9 35
TMR_00332 0.58 0.55 0.63 54 67075 37 5 27 5 45
TMR_00366 0.79 0.76 0.83 76 67804 27 3 13 11 24
TMR_00378 0.77 0.75 0.79 73 67804 32 4 15 13 24
TMR_00404 0.67 0.66 0.68 61 67438 45 7 22 16 31
TMR_00427 0.67 0.60 0.74 58 67450 25 8 12 5 39
TMR_00443 0.61 0.57 0.66 59 67071 35 5 26 4 45
TMR_00451 0.49 0.46 0.53 41 63469 40 11 25 4 48
TMR_00458 0.56 0.49 0.63 46 63473 30 8 19 3 47
TMR_00469 0.78 0.74 0.83 74 64531 24 5 10 9 26
TMR_00472 0.79 0.73 0.85 71 64536 24 7 6 11 26
TMR_00519 0.52 0.48 0.56 46 63108 47 11 25 11 49
TMR_00520 0.51 0.48 0.54 48 63101 51 14 27 10 51
TMR_00522 0.55 0.52 0.60 50 63106 43 11 23 9 47
TMR_00528 0.54 0.52 0.57 50 63102 48 12 26 10 47
TMR_00540 0.49 0.44 0.53 46 73450 47 9 31 7 58
TMR_00568 0.77 0.69 0.86 68 60647 21 1 10 10 31
TMR_00571 0.78 0.73 0.84 72 60640 27 2 12 13 27
TMR_00580 0.78 0.73 0.84 73 60639 26 3 11 12 27
TMR_00584 0.78 0.71 0.86 69 60995 21 3 8 10 28
TMR_00586 0.74 0.70 0.78 68 60988 28 6 13 9 29
TMR_00616 0.77 0.72 0.83 71 67075 21 4 11 6 28
TMR_00699 0.66 0.58 0.76 59 67083 24 1 18 5 43
TMR_00702 0.60 0.51 0.71 51 67089 26 5 16 5 49
TMR_00703 0.81 0.73 0.90 72 67448 13 1 7 5 27

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1886
Total TN 2904341
Total FP 1026
Total FP CONTRA 246
Total FP INCONS 580
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 2547
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.032
Sensitivity 0.425
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.