CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.487 > 0.350
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.470 ± 0.117 > 0.358 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.480 > 0.159
Positive Predictive Value 0.495 < 0.770
Total TP 706 > 234
Total TN 1035223 < 1036346
Total FP 896 > 77
Total FP CONTRA 161 > 3
Total FP INCONS 560 > 67
Total FP COMP 175 > 7
Total FN 764 < 1236
P-value 2.41358941668e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 706
Total TN 1035223
Total FP 896
Total FP CONTRA 161
Total FP INCONS 560
Total FP COMP 175
Total FN 764
Total Scores
MCC 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.470 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.495
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.24 0.24 0.24 28 103624 107 18 70 19 87
CRW_00016 0.62 0.57 0.67 68 77320 45 5 28 12 52
CRW_00610 0.45 0.44 0.46 36 36236 43 6 37 0 45
CRW_00613 0.63 0.58 0.68 45 34914 29 1 20 8 33
CRW_00614 0.09 0.11 0.08 6 121694 140 20 51 69 51
CRW_00618 0.18 0.20 0.17 12 56210 83 10 48 25 49
CRW_00633 0.69 0.67 0.71 71 63446 33 8 21 4 35
CRW_00634 0.33 0.34 0.33 32 64522 70 14 52 4 62
CRW_00670 0.79 0.74 0.83 89 70018 21 6 12 3 31
CRW_00671 0.65 0.62 0.68 72 62729 39 7 27 5 45
CRW_00672 0.48 0.49 0.47 54 72275 65 19 42 4 57
CRW_00674 0.58 0.56 0.62 69 83324 45 7 36 2 55
CRW_00676 0.54 0.55 0.53 63 93410 69 15 40 14 52
CRW_00692 0.20 0.21 0.19 19 68537 84 24 55 5 71
PDB_00827 0.58 0.52 0.66 42 26964 23 1 21 1 39

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 234
Total TN 1036346
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 1236
Total Scores
MCC 0.350
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.358 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.159
Positive Predictive Value 0.770
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.