CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold4 & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold4 CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.392 > 0.343
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.398 ± 0.072 > 0.348 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.361 > 0.157
Positive Predictive Value 0.429 < 0.750
Total TP 468 > 204
Total TN 810048 < 810867
Total FP 685 > 68
Total FP CONTRA 98 > 3
Total FP INCONS 525 > 65
Total FP COMP 62 > 0
Total FN 830 < 1094
P-value 2.28439804626e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold4 and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold4 and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Vsfold4 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 468
Total TN 810048
Total FP 685
Total FP CONTRA 98
Total FP INCONS 525
Total FP COMP 62
Total FN 830
Total Scores
MCC 0.392
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.398 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.361
Positive Predictive Value 0.429
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.53 0.46 0.61 55 77331 44 4 31 9 65
CRW_00610 0.40 0.36 0.46 29 36252 37 5 29 3 52
CRW_00613 0.48 0.42 0.54 33 34919 34 2 26 6 45
CRW_00618 0.33 0.31 0.35 19 56225 57 6 30 21 42
CRW_00633 0.38 0.35 0.42 37 63457 52 6 46 0 69
CRW_00634 0.29 0.28 0.30 26 64533 68 8 53 7 68
CRW_00670 0.37 0.34 0.41 41 70025 60 3 56 1 79
CRW_00671 0.55 0.50 0.60 59 62736 40 2 38 0 58
CRW_00672 0.30 0.29 0.32 32 72291 71 14 53 4 79
CRW_00674 0.29 0.26 0.33 32 83339 67 8 57 2 92
CRW_00676 0.34 0.34 0.34 39 93413 80 20 56 4 76
CRW_00692 0.26 0.24 0.28 22 68555 62 20 38 4 68
PDB_00827 0.65 0.54 0.79 44 26972 13 0 12 1 37

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 204
Total TN 810867
Total FP 68
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 1094
Total Scores
MCC 0.343
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.348 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.157
Positive Predictive Value 0.750
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.