CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold5 & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold5 Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.289 > 0.000
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.282 ± 0.040 > 0.000 ± 0.000
Sensitivity 0.276 > 0.000
Positive Predictive Value 0.306 > 0.000
Total TP 896 > 0
Total TN 1853404 < 1856331
Total FP 2136 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 254 > 0
Total FP INCONS 1777 > 0
Total FP COMP 105 > 0
Total FN 2352 < 3248
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold5 and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold5 and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 896
Total TN 1853404
Total FP 2136
Total FP CONTRA 254
Total FP INCONS 1777
Total FP COMP 105
Total FN 2352
Total Scores
MCC 0.289
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.282 ± 0.040
Sensitivity 0.276
Positive Predictive Value 0.306
Nr of predictions 35

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00001 0.40 0.37 0.44 28 34127 39 6 30 3 47
ASE_00002 0.48 0.42 0.53 31 35453 31 4 23 4 42
ASE_00009 0.20 0.19 0.20 13 26042 52 0 51 1 54
ASE_00014 0.44 0.44 0.45 47 54180 59 8 50 1 59
ASE_00116 0.16 0.15 0.17 10 31566 51 5 45 1 56
ASE_00120 0.20 0.19 0.21 18 46885 68 5 63 0 76
ASE_00121 0.13 0.13 0.14 12 45065 75 9 64 2 80
ASE_00145 0.31 0.29 0.33 32 70027 67 6 60 1 79
ASE_00154 0.19 0.18 0.22 19 65253 70 4 65 1 88
ASE_00155 0.31 0.30 0.34 42 93403 86 7 76 3 100
ASE_00187 0.30 0.30 0.30 34 68523 78 11 67 0 81
ASE_00196 0.30 0.28 0.32 21 31561 48 4 40 4 54
ASE_00205 0.24 0.24 0.25 22 45967 68 10 57 1 68
ASE_00209 0.16 0.15 0.17 13 42993 65 5 60 0 75
ASE_00210 0.20 0.20 0.20 13 27197 53 8 43 2 52
ASE_00213 0.22 0.21 0.23 14 27200 49 10 37 2 52
ASE_00346 0.22 0.21 0.24 20 48120 66 3 62 1 77
ASE_00359 0.18 0.19 0.18 15 42695 69 10 58 1 65
ASE_00360 0.22 0.22 0.23 14 29343 46 10 36 0 51
ASE_00417 0.37 0.37 0.37 37 54514 65 13 51 1 63
ASE_00418 0.22 0.21 0.23 16 38712 58 1 52 5 59
CRW_00016 0.40 0.38 0.42 45 77315 67 4 57 6 75
CRW_00610 0.29 0.28 0.30 23 36238 57 6 48 3 58
CRW_00613 0.48 0.46 0.51 36 34909 41 2 33 6 42
CRW_00618 0.24 0.26 0.23 16 56210 76 9 45 22 45
CRW_00633 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 63546 0 0 0 0 106
CRW_00634 0.32 0.33 0.32 31 64523 75 10 56 9 63
CRW_00670 0.40 0.38 0.43 45 70020 61 3 57 1 75
CRW_00671 0.29 0.26 0.33 31 62740 64 2 62 0 86
CRW_00672 0.39 0.40 0.39 44 72278 70 14 54 2 67
CRW_00674 0.33 0.31 0.36 38 83330 74 5 63 6 86
CRW_00676 0.34 0.36 0.33 41 93405 88 19 63 6 74
CRW_00692 0.36 0.38 0.34 34 68534 67 21 46 0 56
PDB_00827 0.51 0.42 0.62 34 26973 22 0 21 1 47
RFA_00598 0.07 0.07 0.06 7 84557 111 20 82 9 94

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 0
Total TN 1856331
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 3248
Total Scores
MCC 0.000
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.000 ± 0.000
Sensitivity 0.000
Positive Predictive Value 0.000
Nr of predictions 35

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 34191 0 0 0 0 75
ASE_00002 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 35511 0 0 0 0 73
ASE_00009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 26106 0 0 0 0 67
ASE_00014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54285 0 0 0 0 106
ASE_00116 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31626 0 0 0 0 66
ASE_00120 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46971 0 0 0 0 94
ASE_00121 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45150 0 0 0 0 92
ASE_00145 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70125 0 0 0 0 111
ASE_00154 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 65341 0 0 0 0 107
ASE_00155 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 93528 0 0 0 0 142
ASE_00187 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 68635 0 0 0 0 115
ASE_00196 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31626 0 0 0 0 75
ASE_00205 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 90
ASE_00209 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 43071 0 0 0 0 88
ASE_00210 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27261 0 0 0 0 65
ASE_00213 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27261 0 0 0 0 66
ASE_00346 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 48205 0 0 0 0 97
ASE_00359 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 42778 0 0 0 0 80
ASE_00360 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 29403 0 0 0 0 65
ASE_00417 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54615 0 0 0 0 100
ASE_00418 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 38781 0 0 0 0 75
CRW_00016 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 77421 0 0 0 0 120
CRW_00610 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 36315 0 0 0 0 81
CRW_00613 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 34980 0 0 0 0 78
CRW_00618 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56280 0 0 0 0 61
CRW_00633 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 63546 0 0 0 0 106
CRW_00634 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 64620 0 0 0 0 94
CRW_00670 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70125 0 0 0 0 120
CRW_00671 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 62835 0 0 0 0 117
CRW_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 72390 0 0 0 0 111
CRW_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 83436 0 0 0 0 124
CRW_00676 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 93528 0 0 0 0 115
CRW_00692 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 68635 0 0 0 0 90
PDB_00827 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27028 0 0 0 0 81
RFA_00598 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 84666 0 0 0 0 101

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.