CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & PknotsRG [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) PknotsRG
MCC 0.622 > 0.450
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.016 > 0.448 ± 0.036
Sensitivity 0.420 < 0.444
Positive Predictive Value 0.922 > 0.456
Total TP 8964 < 9486
Total TN 52701760 > 52690681
Total FP 1116 < 12203
Total FP CONTRA 124 < 1478
Total FP INCONS 635 < 9838
Total FP COMP 357 < 887
Total FN 12390 > 11868
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and PknotsRG. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PknotsRG).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PknotsRG).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and PknotsRG. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PknotsRG).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 8964
Total TN 52701760
Total FP 1116
Total FP CONTRA 124
Total FP INCONS 635
Total FP COMP 357
Total FN 12390
Total Scores
MCC 0.622
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.016
Sensitivity 0.420
Positive Predictive Value 0.922
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00024 0.74 0.59 0.94 270 1085313 35 5 13 17 188
CRW_00034 0.56 0.35 0.90 166 1142131 28 4 15 9 308
CRW_00048 0.62 0.43 0.91 202 1170992 29 3 18 8 268
CRW_00054 0.62 0.42 0.91 191 1107607 23 4 14 5 265
CRW_00059 0.64 0.43 0.95 204 1172532 17 3 7 7 269
CRW_00061 0.63 0.42 0.94 199 1181742 19 2 10 7 277
CRW_00068 0.69 0.51 0.94 234 1109056 28 2 13 13 223
CRW_00096 0.62 0.43 0.92 198 1178664 29 0 18 11 267
CRW_00140 0.71 0.53 0.95 246 1136018 21 2 12 7 217
CRW_00141 0.64 0.43 0.93 207 1201802 26 4 12 10 269
CRW_00150 0.66 0.46 0.95 216 1152694 16 3 8 5 250
CRW_00152 0.69 0.52 0.92 244 1180151 26 4 17 5 227
CRW_00166 0.64 0.44 0.93 207 1190974 24 0 15 9 261
CRW_00173 0.56 0.36 0.89 158 1082478 26 2 18 6 287
CRW_00177 0.52 0.32 0.87 149 1178708 29 3 20 6 324
CRW_00196 0.64 0.43 0.96 204 1208022 12 2 7 3 271
CRW_00230 0.66 0.47 0.93 227 1198681 28 3 15 10 251
CRW_00245 0.65 0.45 0.93 205 1106108 20 3 12 5 248
CRW_00248 0.56 0.35 0.91 168 1218956 27 4 13 10 316
CRW_00250 0.68 0.50 0.91 241 1198660 33 4 21 8 237
CRW_00256 0.64 0.43 0.97 200 1192533 11 3 4 4 268
CRW_00270 0.66 0.47 0.93 212 1112057 22 4 13 5 243
CRW_00271 0.62 0.41 0.94 191 1122548 17 3 9 5 271
CRW_00273 0.57 0.35 0.92 156 1085431 16 4 10 2 290
CRW_00275 0.60 0.37 0.95 171 1115091 13 2 7 4 286
CRW_00277 0.64 0.44 0.93 201 1110578 20 3 13 4 252
CRW_00278 0.52 0.29 0.92 130 1130115 15 4 7 4 320
CRW_00279 0.68 0.51 0.92 237 1180158 31 3 18 10 227
CRW_00280 0.66 0.46 0.96 209 1118042 12 1 8 3 244
CRW_00281 0.65 0.45 0.95 209 1145120 17 2 10 5 255
CRW_00284 0.53 0.33 0.87 150 1131587 27 3 20 4 306
CRW_00285 0.62 0.41 0.93 188 1118058 18 2 12 4 270
CRW_00289 0.58 0.41 0.84 194 1189422 41 5 32 4 282
CRW_00466 0.62 0.42 0.91 192 1116554 28 4 15 9 266
CRW_00589 0.58 0.35 0.97 156 1094299 10 0 5 5 289
CRW_00590 0.55 0.33 0.93 148 1119597 15 1 10 4 304
CRW_00591 0.66 0.46 0.93 206 1098682 26 1 14 11 240
CRW_00772 0.48 0.30 0.77 122 945842 42 3 33 6 282
CRW_00789 0.61 0.43 0.88 191 1137570 34 1 24 9 256
CRW_00795 0.59 0.38 0.90 150 1152755 40 0 16 24 244
CRW_00849 0.62 0.42 0.92 196 1118046 27 3 15 9 274
CRW_00997 0.60 0.39 0.93 181 1136084 19 3 10 6 283
PDB_00703 0.60 0.40 0.92 196 1073633 28 3 13 12 299
PDB_01105 0.58 0.36 0.94 192 1433767 24 1 11 12 348
PDB_01120 0.62 0.41 0.93 216 1204895 30 4 13 13 311
PDB_01273 0.66 0.48 0.92 234 1118007 37 4 15 18 257

^top



Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 9486
Total TN 52690681
Total FP 12203
Total FP CONTRA 1478
Total FP INCONS 9838
Total FP COMP 887
Total FN 11868
Total Scores
MCC 0.450
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.448 ± 0.036
Sensitivity 0.444
Positive Predictive Value 0.456
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00024 0.77 0.76 0.79 348 1085160 130 18 75 37 110
CRW_00034 0.63 0.63 0.63 300 1141843 196 31 142 23 174
CRW_00048 0.45 0.45 0.45 210 1170748 276 27 230 19 260
CRW_00054 0.53 0.52 0.54 236 1107378 216 34 168 14 220
CRW_00059 0.50 0.49 0.51 233 1172293 234 28 192 14 240
CRW_00061 0.43 0.44 0.43 208 1181469 284 32 244 8 268
CRW_00068 0.33 0.33 0.34 152 1108852 312 37 264 11 305
CRW_00096 0.55 0.55 0.55 255 1178420 227 21 184 22 210
CRW_00140 0.64 0.64 0.65 296 1135820 182 22 140 20 167
CRW_00141 0.51 0.50 0.52 238 1201566 240 29 192 19 238
CRW_00150 0.41 0.41 0.42 190 1152467 282 34 230 18 276
CRW_00152 0.51 0.50 0.52 236 1179961 240 37 182 21 235
CRW_00166 0.53 0.52 0.54 242 1190746 234 25 183 26 226
CRW_00173 0.29 0.29 0.29 128 1082212 325 37 279 9 317
CRW_00177 0.42 0.41 0.42 196 1178413 284 31 240 13 277
CRW_00196 0.47 0.46 0.47 220 1207767 270 26 222 22 255
CRW_00230 0.55 0.54 0.57 260 1198467 221 30 169 22 218
CRW_00245 0.35 0.35 0.34 157 1105872 312 45 254 13 296
CRW_00248 0.57 0.57 0.58 275 1218668 230 24 174 32 209
CRW_00250 0.43 0.43 0.43 205 1198449 287 30 242 15 273
CRW_00256 0.45 0.44 0.46 206 1192291 257 41 202 14 262
CRW_00270 0.38 0.37 0.39 168 1111857 279 39 222 18 287
CRW_00271 0.49 0.48 0.50 220 1122307 239 36 188 15 242
CRW_00273 0.51 0.50 0.51 222 1085169 227 31 179 17 224
CRW_00275 0.42 0.42 0.43 193 1114817 278 26 235 17 264
CRW_00277 0.25 0.25 0.24 113 1110332 354 55 295 4 340
CRW_00278 0.41 0.40 0.42 180 1129825 270 35 216 19 270
CRW_00279 0.29 0.29 0.30 134 1179968 334 40 274 20 330
CRW_00280 0.50 0.50 0.51 226 1117813 234 28 193 13 227
CRW_00281 0.30 0.30 0.30 138 1144878 340 40 285 15 326
CRW_00284 0.26 0.25 0.26 115 1131320 336 35 290 11 341
CRW_00285 0.47 0.47 0.47 214 1117807 257 31 208 18 244
CRW_00289 0.45 0.44 0.46 209 1189197 272 34 213 25 267
CRW_00466 0.61 0.60 0.62 273 1116325 194 25 142 27 185
CRW_00589 0.22 0.21 0.22 95 1094029 351 37 299 15 350
CRW_00590 0.32 0.31 0.33 141 1119330 303 41 244 18 311
CRW_00591 0.61 0.60 0.62 267 1098475 190 19 142 29 179
CRW_00772 0.24 0.24 0.25 97 945607 320 41 255 24 307
CRW_00789 0.35 0.35 0.35 156 1137342 304 48 240 16 291
CRW_00795 0.24 0.25 0.23 98 1152503 357 51 269 37 296
CRW_00849 0.48 0.48 0.49 225 1117798 260 25 212 23 245
CRW_00997 0.52 0.52 0.52 239 1135819 238 24 196 18 225
PDB_00703 0.50 0.48 0.53 239 1073392 239 21 193 25 256
PDB_01105 0.51 0.50 0.52 269 1433453 278 27 222 29 271
PDB_01120 0.48 0.45 0.51 239 1204657 247 27 205 15 288
PDB_01273 0.47 0.46 0.49 225 1117799 263 23 213 27 266

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.