CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) CRWrnafold
MCC 0.844 > 0.515
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.844 ± 0.012 > 0.512 ± 0.050
Sensitivity 0.786 > 0.508
Positive Predictive Value 0.908 > 0.523
Total TP 10303 > 6664
Total TN 32002127 > 32000733
Total FP 1480 < 6747
Total FP CONTRA 225 < 823
Total FP INCONS 823 < 5258
Total FP COMP 432 < 666
Total FN 2808 < 6447
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 10303
Total TN 32002127
Total FP 1480
Total FP CONTRA 225
Total FP INCONS 823
Total FP COMP 432
Total FN 2808
Total Scores
MCC 0.844
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.844 ± 0.012
Sensitivity 0.786
Positive Predictive Value 0.908
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00054 0.87 0.82 0.93 374 1107413 39 9 20 10 82
CRW_00068 0.87 0.82 0.93 375 1108900 39 9 21 9 82
CRW_00140 0.87 0.82 0.92 379 1135867 41 9 23 9 84
CRW_00173 0.82 0.76 0.88 340 1082268 59 9 39 11 105
CRW_00245 0.87 0.82 0.93 372 1105927 39 9 20 10 81
CRW_00270 0.87 0.82 0.93 373 1111883 39 9 21 9 82
CRW_00271 0.84 0.77 0.90 358 1122354 48 8 31 9 104
CRW_00273 0.86 0.81 0.92 361 1085207 41 8 25 8 85
CRW_00275 0.87 0.81 0.92 371 1114869 40 9 22 9 86
CRW_00277 0.85 0.80 0.90 363 1110392 50 13 27 10 90
CRW_00278 0.83 0.77 0.90 347 1129872 48 8 29 11 103
CRW_00280 0.84 0.79 0.90 357 1117863 52 9 31 12 96
CRW_00281 0.86 0.79 0.92 368 1144943 39 9 21 9 96
CRW_00283 0.79 0.73 0.84 316 1015651 66 12 46 8 116
CRW_00284 0.84 0.79 0.90 360 1131361 50 9 30 11 96
CRW_00285 0.85 0.79 0.91 361 1117862 46 11 26 9 97
CRW_00292 0.76 0.70 0.82 322 1123856 83 13 59 11 139
CRW_00466 0.87 0.82 0.93 374 1116361 39 8 22 9 84
CRW_00589 0.87 0.81 0.93 360 1094074 43 2 24 17 85
CRW_00590 0.87 0.81 0.93 364 1119366 44 2 24 18 88
CRW_00591 0.88 0.82 0.94 365 1098513 44 3 22 19 81
CRW_00772 0.80 0.74 0.87 297 945660 69 2 41 26 107
CRW_00778 0.84 0.79 0.90 303 1201687 92 4 31 57 81
CRW_00789 0.85 0.79 0.92 353 1137401 53 5 27 21 94
CRW_00849 0.82 0.76 0.89 358 1117856 57 12 34 11 112
CRW_00997 0.87 0.81 0.93 377 1135871 39 9 21 9 87
CRW_01343 0.86 0.81 0.92 351 977520 61 3 27 31 83
PDB_00703 0.81 0.72 0.92 356 1073456 57 6 27 24 139
PDB_01273 0.80 0.71 0.90 348 1117874 63 6 32 25 143

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 6664
Total TN 32000733
Total FP 6747
Total FP CONTRA 823
Total FP INCONS 5258
Total FP COMP 666
Total FN 6447
Total Scores
MCC 0.515
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.050
Sensitivity 0.508
Positive Predictive Value 0.523
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00054 0.57 0.56 0.57 257 1107367 210 22 170 18 199
CRW_00068 0.57 0.57 0.58 259 1108856 209 20 170 19 198
CRW_00140 0.49 0.49 0.48 226 1135811 256 30 211 15 237
CRW_00173 0.38 0.38 0.39 168 1082220 282 31 237 14 277
CRW_00245 0.53 0.53 0.54 240 1105883 225 26 179 20 213
CRW_00270 0.49 0.49 0.50 225 1111832 246 27 202 17 230
CRW_00271 0.69 0.67 0.71 311 1122312 152 21 107 24 151
CRW_00273 0.41 0.41 0.41 181 1085155 279 39 226 14 265
CRW_00275 0.65 0.65 0.66 296 1114820 177 28 127 22 161
CRW_00277 0.44 0.43 0.44 196 1110351 263 35 213 15 257
CRW_00278 0.41 0.40 0.42 182 1129824 270 20 230 20 268
CRW_00280 0.67 0.66 0.68 299 1117818 160 18 125 17 154
CRW_00281 0.60 0.59 0.61 274 1144893 197 27 147 23 190
CRW_00283 0.38 0.38 0.37 164 1015587 296 41 233 22 268
CRW_00284 0.51 0.50 0.51 228 1131314 245 27 191 27 228
CRW_00285 0.68 0.67 0.69 305 1117819 160 25 111 24 153
CRW_00292 0.33 0.33 0.34 151 1123806 312 48 245 19 310
CRW_00466 0.71 0.70 0.71 320 1116316 158 22 107 29 138
CRW_00589 0.35 0.34 0.36 153 1094035 290 40 232 18 292
CRW_00590 0.61 0.59 0.64 268 1119334 184 21 133 30 184
CRW_00591 0.56 0.56 0.56 249 1098461 218 30 163 25 197
CRW_00772 0.19 0.18 0.19 74 945610 325 42 274 9 330
CRW_00778 0.42 0.41 0.42 159 1201646 291 25 195 71 225
CRW_00789 0.51 0.50 0.52 224 1137356 236 32 174 30 223
CRW_00849 0.47 0.47 0.47 222 1117790 269 18 230 21 248
CRW_00997 0.69 0.69 0.69 318 1135820 167 27 113 27 146
CRW_01343 0.37 0.36 0.38 158 977489 271 43 211 17 276
PDB_00703 0.65 0.61 0.69 304 1073402 166 18 121 27 191
PDB_01273 0.54 0.52 0.56 253 1117806 233 20 181 32 238

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.