CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Murlet(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Murlet(20)
MCC 0.745 > 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.750 ± 0.161 > 0.620 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.707 > 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.785 > 0.708
Total TP 3076 > 2368
Total TN 12464903 < 12465477
Total FP 1039 < 1159
Total FP CONTRA 149 = 149
Total FP INCONS 694 < 828
Total FP COMP 196 > 182
Total FN 1273 < 1981
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Murlet(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Murlet(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Murlet(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3076
Total TN 12464903
Total FP 1039
Total FP CONTRA 149
Total FP INCONS 694
Total FP COMP 196
Total FN 1273
Total Scores
MCC 0.745
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.750 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.707
Positive Predictive Value 0.785
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.92 0.88 0.97 417 1178448 25 2 13 10 56
CRW_00250 0.94 0.91 0.98 435 1198481 12 4 6 2 43
CRW_00278 0.77 0.70 0.84 316 1129880 68 9 51 8 134
CRW_00280 0.92 0.88 0.95 398 1117843 21 4 15 2 55
CRW_00330 0.47 0.45 0.49 232 1988538 308 45 200 63 285
CRW_00411 0.55 0.52 0.59 257 1615067 222 34 145 43 239
CRW_00414 0.43 0.41 0.44 205 1665761 293 45 214 34 290
CRW_00789 0.85 0.80 0.91 357 1137392 54 3 34 17 90
PDB_01105 0.90 0.85 0.96 459 1433493 36 3 16 17 81

^top



Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2368
Total TN 12465477
Total FP 1159
Total FP CONTRA 149
Total FP INCONS 828
Total FP COMP 182
Total FN 1981
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.75 0.70 0.81 330 1178473 93 14 63 16 143
CRW_00250 0.75 0.68 0.84 325 1198537 73 14 50 9 153
CRW_00278 0.75 0.67 0.83 302 1129893 75 12 49 14 148
CRW_00280 0.78 0.72 0.85 328 1117874 75 11 47 17 125
CRW_00330 0.39 0.31 0.49 160 1988690 189 26 139 24 357
CRW_00411 0.31 0.25 0.40 122 1615195 206 23 163 20 374
CRW_00414 0.33 0.29 0.36 146 1665818 288 38 223 27 349
CRW_00789 0.78 0.71 0.86 318 1137416 79 8 44 27 129
PDB_01105 0.73 0.62 0.86 337 1433581 81 3 50 28 203

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.