CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & PPfold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold PPfold(20)
MCC 0.753 > 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.759 ± 0.199 > 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.710 > 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.799 < 0.818
Total TP 2073 > 1989
Total TN 7954783 < 7954946
Total FP 619 > 607
Total FP CONTRA 98 > 71
Total FP INCONS 423 > 371
Total FP COMP 98 < 165
Total FN 847 < 931
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and PPfold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and PPfold(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and PPfold(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and PPfold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and PPfold(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2073
Total TN 7954783
Total FP 619
Total FP CONTRA 98
Total FP INCONS 423
Total FP COMP 98
Total FN 847
Total Scores
MCC 0.753
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.759 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.710
Positive Predictive Value 0.799
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.86 0.80 0.91 376 1192327 51 4 33 14 92
CRW_00326 0.58 0.54 0.63 271 1627677 194 30 132 32 231
CRW_00358 0.46 0.45 0.47 227 1674887 268 53 198 17 280
CRW_00590 0.85 0.79 0.91 358 1119364 45 3 31 11 94
CRW_00997 0.92 0.90 0.95 419 1135835 28 6 18 4 45
PDB_01120 0.88 0.80 0.97 422 1204693 33 2 11 20 105

^top



Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.